All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] git master build failure
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:41:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5763F000.3010102@ilande.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c47c845-0934-4510-556f-edb48f1b78e2@redhat.com>

On 15/06/16 13:35, Laszlo Ersek wrote:

> On 06/15/16 12:08, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> On 15/06/16 10:48, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:14:18AM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>
>>>> Just to let you know that after pulling git master
>>>> (49237b856ae58ee7955be0b959c504c51b014f20) I see the following build
>>>> failure here:
>>>
>>> Just pulled and successfully compiled,
>>>   configure --target-list=aarch64-softmmu
>>>
>>> And, I'm not sure how it's possible to this warning below. See below
>>>
>>>>
>>>> cc -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/tcg
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/tcg/i386
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/linux-headers
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/linux-headers -I.
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/include
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/hw/arm -Ihw/arm -I/usr/include/pixman-1
>>>>   -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/dtc/libfdt -Werror -m64 -D_GNU_SOURCE
>>>> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -Wstrict-prototypes
>>>> -Wredundant-decls -Wall -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes
>>>> -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common  -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-include-dirs
>>>> -Wempty-body -Wnested-externs -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k -Winit-self
>>>> -Wignored-qualifiers -Wold-style-declaration -Wold-style-definition
>>>> -Wtype-limits -fstack-protector-all -I/usr/include/p11-kit-1
>>>> -I/usr/include/libpng12    -I../linux-headers -I..
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/target-arm -DNEED_CPU_H
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/include -MMD -MP -MT hw/arm/vexpress.o
>>>> -MF hw/arm/vexpress.d -O2 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -pthread
>>>> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include
>>>> -g   -c -o hw/arm/vexpress.o /home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/hw/arm/vexpress.c
>>>> cc -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/tcg
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/tcg/i386
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/linux-headers
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/linux-headers -I.
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/include
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/hw/arm -Ihw/arm -I/usr/include/pixman-1
>>>>   -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/dtc/libfdt -Werror -m64 -D_GNU_SOURCE
>>>> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -Wstrict-prototypes
>>>> -Wredundant-decls -Wall -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes
>>>> -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common  -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-include-dirs
>>>> -Wempty-body -Wnested-externs -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k -Winit-self
>>>> -Wignored-qualifiers -Wold-style-declaration -Wold-style-definition
>>>> -Wtype-limits -fstack-protector-all -I/usr/include/p11-kit-1
>>>> -I/usr/include/libpng12    -I../linux-headers -I..
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/target-arm -DNEED_CPU_H
>>>> -I/home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/include -MMD -MP -MT hw/arm/virt.o -MF
>>>> hw/arm/virt.d -O2 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -pthread
>>>> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include
>>>> -g   -c -o hw/arm/virt.o /home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/hw/arm/virt.c
>>>> /home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/hw/arm/virt.c: In function
>>>> ‘virt_2_6_class_init’:
>>>> /home/build/src/qemu/git/qemu/hw/arm/virt.c:1509:5: error: array
>>>> subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
>>>
>>> hw/arm/virt.c:1509 is SET_MACHINE_COMPAT(mc, VIRT_COMPAT_2_6), and
>>> VIRT_COMPAT_2_6 is HW_COMPAT_2_6 (which is currently nothing).
>>>
>>> SET_MACHINE_COMPAT is
>>>
>>> #define SET_MACHINE_COMPAT(m, COMPAT) \
>>>     do {                              \
>>>         int i;                        \
>>>         static GlobalProperty props[] = {       \
>>>             COMPAT                              \
>>>             { /* end of list */ }               \
>>>         };                                      \
>>>         if (!m->compat_props) { \
>>>             m->compat_props = g_array_new(false, false, sizeof(void *));
>>> \
>>>         } \
>>>         for (i = 0; props[i].driver != NULL; i++) {    \
>>>             GlobalProperty *prop = &props[i];          \
>>>             g_array_append_val(m->compat_props, prop); \
>>>         }                                              \
>>>     } while (0)
>>>
>>>
>>> so props[] is { {} }, which means props[0].driver == NULL. 0 should
>>> be a valid subscript, and we shouldn't try any others.
>>>
>>> Are you using special config options or a special compiler?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> drew
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Is that from a clean clone of the repository? I wonder if a change to a
>> generated file isn't being picked up somewhere by "make distclean". My
>> standard build script is this:
>>
>> make distclean
>> './configure' '--target-list=x86_64-softmmu sparc64-softmmu
>> sparc-softmmu ppc-softmmu arm-softmmu' '--disable-pie'
>>
>> System is standard Debian wheezy on amd64.
> 
> According to <https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/gcc>, your gcc is 4.7.2
> based (4:4.7.2-1). With a simple google search, I found the following
> gcc bugs:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53198
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
> 
> My guess is that Debian has not backported the upstream fix(es) for this
> gcc bug. In particular, if you look at gcc bug #53198 referenced above,
> it says:
> 
>   Known to fail: 4.6.0, 4.6.1, 4.6.2, 4.6.3, 4.7.2, 4.7.4
> 
> which includes the Wheezy version (4.7.2). Clicking the "Debian
> Changelog" link on the above p.d.o page, I don't see anything that would
> indicate that Debian backported the fix.
> 
> (For reference, I run RHEL-7.2.z, with gcc version 4.8.5-4. According to
> #56273 above, gcc-4.8.4 is also affected, but 4.8.5 is not (see the
> Target Milestone field, and the Status field). I built
> qemu-system-aarch64 from upstream 49237b856ae5 a few hours ago.)
> 
> I suggest that you open a debian bug; I don't see a report for this
> issue yet <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=gcc-4.7>.

Hi Laszlo,

Thank you looking into this. I know that some workarounds have been
applied for similar bugs in Peter's setup, but in general should I
assume that out-of-the-box Debian oldstable is now no longer supported
to build QEMU?


ATB,

Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-17 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-15  7:14 [Qemu-devel] git master build failure Mark Cave-Ayland
2016-06-15  9:48 ` Andrew Jones
2016-06-15 10:08   ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2016-06-15 10:23     ` Andrew Jones
2016-06-15 11:26       ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2016-06-15 11:46         ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2016-06-15 12:35     ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-06-17 12:41       ` Mark Cave-Ayland [this message]
2016-06-17 12:55         ` Peter Maydell
2016-06-17 19:45           ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5763F000.3010102@ilande.co.uk \
    --to=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.