All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	qemu devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"eddie . dong" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	Yang Hongyang <hongyang.yang@easystack.cn>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/3] filter-rewriter: rewrite tcp packet to keep secondary connection
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:27:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57678CDA.7020700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465902912-27527-4-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>



On 2016年06月14日 19:15, Zhang Chen wrote:
> We will rewrite tcp packet secondary received and sent.

More verbose please. E.g which fields were rewrote and why.

> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>   net/filter-rewriter.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   trace-events          |  3 ++
>   2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/filter-rewriter.c b/net/filter-rewriter.c
> index 12f88c5..86a2f53 100644
> --- a/net/filter-rewriter.c
> +++ b/net/filter-rewriter.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>   #include "qemu/main-loop.h"
>   #include "qemu/iov.h"
>   #include "net/checksum.h"
> +#include "trace.h"
>   
>   #define FILTER_COLO_REWRITER(obj) \
>       OBJECT_CHECK(RewriterState, (obj), TYPE_FILTER_REWRITER)
> @@ -64,6 +65,75 @@ static int is_tcp_packet(Packet *pkt)
>       }
>   }
>   
> +static int handle_primary_tcp_pkt(NetFilterState *nf,
> +                                  Connection *conn,
> +                                  Packet *pkt)
> +{
> +    struct tcphdr *tcp_pkt;
> +
> +    tcp_pkt = (struct tcphdr *)pkt->transport_layer;
> +
> +    if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_FILTER_REWRITER_DEBUG)) {

Why not use tracepoints directly?

> +        char *sdebug, *ddebug;
> +        sdebug = strdup(inet_ntoa(pkt->ip->ip_src));
> +        ddebug = strdup(inet_ntoa(pkt->ip->ip_dst));
> +        fprintf(stderr, "%s: src/dst: %s/%s p: seq/ack=%u/%u"
> +                "  flags=%x\n", __func__, sdebug, ddebug,
> +                ntohl(tcp_pkt->th_seq), ntohl(tcp_pkt->th_ack),
> +                tcp_pkt->th_flags);
> +        g_free(sdebug);
> +        g_free(ddebug);
> +    }
> +
> +    if (((tcp_pkt->th_flags & (TH_ACK | TH_SYN)) == TH_ACK)) {
> +        /* save primary colo tcp packet seq */
> +        conn->primary_seq = ntohl(tcp_pkt->th_ack) - 1;

Looks like primary_seq will only be updated during handshake, I wonder 
how this works.

> +
> +        /* adjust tcp seq to make secondary guest handle it */
> +        tcp_pkt->th_ack = htonl(conn->secondary_seq + 1);

I'm not sure this can work for all cases. I believe we should also 
rewrite seq here. And to me, a better approach is to track the offset of 
seq between pri and sec during handshake and rewrite both ack and seq 
based on this offset.

> +        net_checksum_calculate((uint8_t *)pkt->data, pkt->size);
> +    }
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int handle_secondary_tcp_pkt(NetFilterState *nf,
> +                                    Connection *conn,
> +                                    Packet *pkt)
> +{
> +    struct tcphdr *tcp_pkt;
> +
> +    tcp_pkt = (struct tcphdr *)pkt->transport_layer;
> +
> +    if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_FILTER_REWRITER_DEBUG)) {
> +        char *sdebug, *ddebug;
> +        sdebug = strdup(inet_ntoa(pkt->ip->ip_src));
> +        ddebug = strdup(inet_ntoa(pkt->ip->ip_dst));
> +        printf("handle_secondary_tcp_pkt conn->secondary_seq = %u,\n",
> +               conn->secondary_seq);
> +        printf("handle_secondary_tcp_pkt conn->primary_seq = %u,\n",
> +               conn->primary_seq);
> +        fprintf(stderr, "%s: src/dst: %s/%s p: seq/ack=%u/%u"
> +                "  flags=%x\n", __func__, sdebug, ddebug,
> +                ntohl(tcp_pkt->th_seq), ntohl(tcp_pkt->th_ack),
> +                tcp_pkt->th_flags);
> +        g_free(sdebug);
> +        g_free(ddebug);
> +    }
> +
> +    if (((tcp_pkt->th_flags & (TH_ACK | TH_SYN)) == (TH_ACK | TH_SYN))) {
> +        /* save client's seq */
> +        conn->secondary_seq = ntohl(tcp_pkt->th_seq);
> +    }
> +
> +    if ((tcp_pkt->th_flags & (TH_ACK | TH_SYN)) == TH_ACK) {
> +        tcp_pkt->th_seq = htonl(conn->primary_seq + 1);
> +        net_checksum_calculate((uint8_t *)pkt->data, pkt->size);
> +    }
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static ssize_t colo_rewriter_receive_iov(NetFilterState *nf,
>                                            NetClientState *sender,
>                                            unsigned flags,
> @@ -106,10 +176,30 @@ static ssize_t colo_rewriter_receive_iov(NetFilterState *nf,
>           if (sender == nf->netdev) {
>               /* This packet is sent by netdev itself */
>               /* NET_FILTER_DIRECTION_TX */
> -            /* handle_primary_tcp_pkt */
> +            if (!handle_primary_tcp_pkt(nf, conn, pkt)) {
> +                qemu_net_queue_send(s->incoming_queue, sender, 0,
> +                (const uint8_t *)pkt->data, pkt->size, NULL);
> +                packet_destroy(pkt, NULL);
> +                pkt = NULL;
> +                /*
> +                 * We block the packet here,after rewrite pkt
> +                 * and will send it
> +                 */
> +                return 1;
> +            }
>           } else {
>               /* NET_FILTER_DIRECTION_RX */
> -            /* handle_secondary_tcp_pkt */
> +            if (!handle_secondary_tcp_pkt(nf, conn, pkt)) {
> +                qemu_net_queue_send(s->incoming_queue, sender, 0,
> +                (const uint8_t *)pkt->data, pkt->size, NULL);
> +                packet_destroy(pkt, NULL);
> +                pkt = NULL;
> +                /*
> +                 * We block the packet here,after rewrite pkt
> +                 * and will send it
> +                 */
> +                return 1;
> +            }
>           }
>       }
>   
> diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events
> index 6686cdf..5d798c6 100644
> --- a/trace-events
> +++ b/trace-events
> @@ -1927,3 +1927,6 @@ colo_compare_icmp_miscompare_mtu(const char *sta, int size) ": %s  %d"
>   colo_compare_ip_info(int psize, const char *sta, const char *stb, int ssize, const char *stc, const char *std) "ppkt size = %d, ip_src = %s, ip_dst = %s, spkt size = %d, ip_src = %s, ip_dst = %s"
>   colo_old_packet_check_found(int64_t old_time) "%" PRId64
>   colo_compare_miscompare(void) ""
> +
> +# net/filter-rewriter.c
> +colo_filter_rewriter_debug(void) ""

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-20  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-14 11:15 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] filter-rewriter: introduce filter-rewriter Zhang Chen
2016-06-14 11:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/3] filter-rewriter: introduce filter-rewriter initialization Zhang Chen
2016-06-14 11:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/3] filter-rewriter: track connection and parse packet Zhang Chen
2016-06-14 11:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/3] filter-rewriter: rewrite tcp packet to keep secondary connection Zhang Chen
2016-06-20  6:27   ` Jason Wang [this message]
2016-06-20 12:14     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-22  3:12       ` Zhang Chen
2016-06-22  6:34         ` Jason Wang
2016-06-23 10:48           ` Zhang Chen
2016-06-24  6:08             ` Jason Wang
2016-06-28  6:33               ` Zhang Chen
2016-06-29  1:55                 ` Jason Wang
2016-06-29  6:13                   ` Zhang Chen
2016-06-30 12:17                     ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57678CDA.7020700@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=hongyang.yang@easystack.cn \
    --cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.