From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH] dropping librte_ivshmem Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:44:59 +0100 Message-ID: <57680F7B.5040104@intel.com> References: <1465481396-23968-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <1679257.PTMOF8o7eO@xps13> <57619B6C.8080408@intel.com> <2195337.EI94ugUIUk@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anatoly Burakov , David Marchand , dev@dpdk.org, sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com, kevin.traynor@intel.com, pmatilai@redhat.com To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677A59A91 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:45:30 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <2195337.EI94ugUIUk@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 6/15/2016 7:34 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-06-15 19:16, Ferruh Yigit: >> On 6/9/2016 10:26 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> So this is my proposal: >>> Someone start working on the above cleanup now, otherwise the whole >>> rte_ivshmem feature will be deprecated in 16.07 and removed in 16.11. >> >> I would like to note that at least SPP (soft patch panel) is using >> rte_ivshmem feature. > > Why? > Can SPP work without ivshmem? > Can do, it supports both ivshmem and vhost. But ivshmem gives clearly more performance for VM to VM communication.