From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:2205 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752262AbcFUBso (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 21:48:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] btrfs: fix free space calculation in dump_space_info() To: Omar Sandoval References: <1466419625-6755-1-git-send-email-wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20160620180951.GA16446@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com> CC: From: Wang Xiaoguang Message-ID: <57689CA1.7040000@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:47:13 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160620180951.GA16446@vader.DHCP.thefacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: hello, On 06/21/2016 02:09 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:47:05PM +0800, Wang Xiaoguang wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang >> --- >> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c >> index f3e6666..13a87fe 100644 >> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c >> @@ -7736,8 +7736,8 @@ static void dump_space_info(struct btrfs_space_info *info, u64 bytes, >> printk(KERN_INFO "BTRFS: space_info %llu has %llu free, is %sfull\n", >> info->flags, >> info->total_bytes - info->bytes_used - info->bytes_pinned - >> - info->bytes_reserved - info->bytes_readonly, >> - (info->full) ? "" : "not "); >> + info->bytes_reserved - info->bytes_readonly - >> + info->bytes_may_use, (info->full) ? "" : "not "); >> printk(KERN_INFO "BTRFS: space_info total=%llu, used=%llu, pinned=%llu, " >> "reserved=%llu, may_use=%llu, readonly=%llu\n", >> info->total_bytes, info->bytes_used, info->bytes_pinned, > I think you meant to send this to linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Yes, should I resend it to linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org again? thanks. Regards, Xiaoguang Wang >