All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com>
Cc: <acme@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<pi3orama@163.com>, He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] perf record: Toggle overwrite ring buffer for reading
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:19:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <576B3923.2020909@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACbG30-ymdXDoMKSGvFDGBvnF5chHrbGOHXy5bxRM0L+uOrR9w@mail.gmail.com>



On 2016/6/22 22:33, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> On 22 June 2016 at 04:08, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> wrote:
>> @@ -549,17 +573,72 @@ static struct perf_event_header finished_round_event = {
>>          .type = PERF_RECORD_FINISHED_ROUND,
>>   };
>>
>> -static int record__mmap_read_all(struct record *rec)
>> +static void
>> +record__toggle_overwrite_evsels(struct record *rec,
>> +                               enum overwrite_evt_state state)
>> +{
>> +       struct perf_evlist *evlist = rec->overwrite_evlist;
>> +       enum overwrite_evt_state old_state = rec->overwrite_evt_state;
>> +       enum action {
>> +               NONE,
>> +               PAUSE,
>> +               RESUME,
>> +       } action = NONE;
>> +
>> +       switch (old_state) {
>> +       case OVERWRITE_EVT_RUNNING:
>> +               if (state != OVERWRITE_EVT_RUNNING)
>> +                       action = PAUSE;
>> +               break;
>> +       case OVERWRITE_EVT_DATA_PENDING:
>> +               if (state == OVERWRITE_EVT_RUNNING)
>> +                       action = RESUME;
>> +               break;
>> +       case OVERWRITE_EVT_EMPTY:
>> +               if (state == OVERWRITE_EVT_RUNNING)
>> +                       action = RESUME;
>> +               if (state == OVERWRITE_EVT_DATA_PENDING)
>> +                       state = OVERWRITE_EVT_EMPTY;
> else if (state == OVERWRITE_EVT_DATA_PENDING)

You are right, but I believe compiler makes identical binaries even
without 'else'. With no 'else' these two 'if' are aligned.

I'll recheck this patch.

>> +               break;
>> +       default:
>> +               WARN_ONCE(1, "Shouldn't get there\n");
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       rec->overwrite_evt_state = state;
>> +
>> +       if (action == NONE)
>> +               return;
> I think the above two lines are not required.  The switch below should
> be enough.
>
>> +
>> +       if (!evlist)
>> +               return;
>> +
>> +       switch (action) {
>> +       case PAUSE:
>> +               perf_evlist__pause(evlist);
>> +               break;
>> +       case RESUME:
>> +               perf_evlist__resume(evlist);
>> +               break;
>> +       case NONE:
>> +       default:
>> +               break;
>> +       }
>> +}
>> +
> --
> Nilay

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-23  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-22  9:08 [PATCH v9 0/8] perf tools: Support overwritable ring buffer Wang Nan
2016-06-22  9:08 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] perf evlist: Introduce aux evlist Wang Nan
2016-06-22 13:17   ` Nilay Vaish
2016-06-22 13:40     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-06-23  1:29       ` Wangnan (F)
2016-06-23  2:11   ` [PATCH v9.1] " Wang Nan
2016-06-22  9:08 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] perf tests: Add testcase for auxiliary evlist Wang Nan
2016-06-22  9:08 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] perf record: Extract perf_evlist__mmap_ex() processing to a new function Wang Nan
2016-06-22  9:08 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] perf record: Introduce rec->overwrite_evlist for overwritable events Wang Nan
2016-06-22  9:08 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] perf record: Toggle overwrite ring buffer for reading Wang Nan
2016-06-22 14:33   ` Nilay Vaish
2016-06-23  1:19     ` Wangnan (F) [this message]
2016-06-22  9:08 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] perf tools: Enable overwrite settings Wang Nan
2016-06-22  9:08 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] perf tools: Don't warn about out of order event if write_backward is used Wang Nan
2016-06-22  9:08 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] perf tools: Add --tail-synthesize option Wang Nan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=576B3923.2020909@huawei.com \
    --to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=nilayvaish@gmail.com \
    --cc=pi3orama@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.