All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, anton@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle/powernv: Fix snooze timeout
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:01:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <576BB395.5050502@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <576BABC5.7020600@gmail.com>

On 06/23/2016 11:28 AM, Balbir Singh wrote:

[ ... ]

>> cpuidle_enter_state()
>> {
>> 	[...]
>> 	time_start = local_clock();
>> 	[enter idle state]
>> 	time_end = local_clock();
>> 	/*
>>           * local_clock() returns the time in nanosecond, let's shift
>>           * by 10 (divide by 1024) to have microsecond based time.
>>           */
>>          diff = (time_end - time_start) >> 10;
>> 	[...]
>> 	dev->last_residency = (int) diff;
>> }
>>
>> Because of >>10 as opposed to /1000, last_residency is lesser by 2.3%

I am surprised the last_residency is 2.3% exactly less. The difference 
between >>10 and /1000 is 2.34%.

What is the next target residency value ?

Does it solve the issue if you replace >>10 by /1000 ?



-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-23 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-22 19:36 [PATCH] cpuidle/powernv: Fix snooze timeout Shreyas B. Prabhu
2016-06-22 22:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-22 23:48 ` Balbir Singh
2016-06-23  4:58   ` Shreyas B Prabhu
2016-06-23  9:28     ` Balbir Singh
2016-06-23  9:41       ` Shreyas B Prabhu
2016-06-23  9:55         ` Balbir Singh
2016-06-23 10:01       ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2016-06-23 13:35         ` Shreyas B Prabhu
2016-06-23 14:36           ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=576BB395.5050502@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.