All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu and heavily increased RSS usage
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:58:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <576BF910.70304@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160621131815.GB2264@work-vm>

Am 21.06.2016 um 15:18 schrieb Dr. David Alan Gilbert:
> * Peter Lieven (pl@kamp.de) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> while upgrading from Qemu 2.2.0 to Qemu 2.5.1.1 I noticed that the RSS memory usage has heavily increased.
>> We use hugepages so the RSS memory does not include VM memory. In Qemu 2.2.0 it used to be ~30MB per vServer
>> and increased to up to 300 - 400MB for Qemu 2.5.1.1 (same with master). The memory increases over time, but seems
>> not to grow indefinetly. I tried to bisect, but had no result so far that made sense. I also tried valgrind / massif, but
>> valgrind does not see the allocation (at least at exit) and massif fails to rund due to - so it pretends - heap corruption.
>>
>> Any help or ideas how to debug further would be appreciated.
> I think I'd try stripping devices off; can you get a similar difference
> to happen with a guest with no USB, no hugepages, no VGA and a simple
> locally stored IDE disk?
>
> If you're having trouble bisecting is it possible it's a change
> in one of the libraries it's linked against?
>
> There was someone asking the other day on #qemu who had a setup that
> was apparently using much more RAM than expected and we didn't
> manage to track it down but I can't remember the version being used.

I currently trying to track the increased usage from release to release. The first increase of RSS usage from ~25MB to ~35MB directly
after machine setup is introduced by this patch:

commit ba3f4f64b0e941b9e03568b826746941bef071f9
Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Jan 21 12:09:14 2015 +0100

     exec: RCUify AddressSpaceDispatch

     Note that even after this patch, most callers of address_space_*
     functions must still be under the big QEMU lock, otherwise the memory
     region returned by address_space_translate can disappear as soon as
     address_space_translate returns.  This will be fixed in the next part
     of this series.

     Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
     Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

@Paolo, @Fam, any idea?

Thanks,
Peter

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-23 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-21  8:21 [Qemu-devel] Qemu and heavily increased RSS usage Peter Lieven
2016-06-21 13:18 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-21 15:12   ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-22 10:56     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-06-22 19:55       ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-22 20:56         ` Peter Maydell
2016-06-24  9:37           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-06-24  9:53             ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-24  9:57               ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-24  9:58             ` Peter Maydell
2016-06-24 10:45               ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-27 12:39                 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-06-27 13:33                   ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-23  9:57   ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-24 22:57     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-23 14:58   ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2016-06-23 15:00     ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-06-23 15:02       ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-23 15:21     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-23 15:31       ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-23 15:47         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-23 16:19           ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-23 16:53             ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-23 21:28               ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-24  4:10                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-24  8:11                   ` Peter Lieven
2016-06-24  8:20                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-24  8:45                       ` Peter Lieven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=576BF910.70304@kamp.de \
    --to=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.