All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com,
	ronniesahlberg@gmail.com, eblake@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iscsi: fix assertion in is_sector_request_lun_aligned
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:19:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <576C0C2C.3090706@kamp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86281c43-7a2f-df46-9297-03629bbd5281@redhat.com>

Am 23.06.2016 um 17:50 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> On 20/06/2016 11:24, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> Commit 94d047a added an assertion the the request alignment check.
>> This introduced 2 issues:
>>   a) A off-by-one error since a request of BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS
>>      is actually allowed.
>>   b) The bdrv_get_block_status call in the read path to check the allocation
>>      status requests up to INT_MAX sectors which triggers the assertion.
>>
>> Fixes: 94d047a35bf663e28f8fef137544d8ea78165add
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
>> ---
>>   block/iscsi.c | 5 +++--
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/iscsi.c b/block/iscsi.c
>> index 7e78ade..9bb5ff6 100644
>> --- a/block/iscsi.c
>> +++ b/block/iscsi.c
>> @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static bool is_byte_request_lun_aligned(int64_t offset, int count,
>>   static bool is_sector_request_lun_aligned(int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors,
>>                                             IscsiLun *iscsilun)
>>   {
>> -    assert(nb_sectors < BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS);
>> +    assert(nb_sectors <= BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS);
>>       return is_byte_request_lun_aligned(sector_num << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
>>                                          nb_sectors << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
>>                                          iscsilun);
>> @@ -661,7 +661,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn iscsi_co_readv(BlockDriverState *bs,
>>           int64_t ret;
>>           int pnum;
>>           BlockDriverState *file;
>> -        ret = iscsi_co_get_block_status(bs, sector_num, INT_MAX, &pnum, &file);
>> +        ret = iscsi_co_get_block_status(bs, sector_num,
>> +                                        BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS, &pnum, &file);
>>           if (ret < 0) {
>>               return ret;
>>           }
>>
> Hi, I've queued this patch.  Can you rebase the allocation map patch on
> top of master + this one?

will do.

Peter

      reply	other threads:[~2016-06-23 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-20  9:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iscsi: fix assertion in is_sector_request_lun_aligned Peter Lieven
2016-06-20 16:47 ` Eric Blake
2016-06-23 15:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-23 16:19   ` Peter Lieven [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=576C0C2C.3090706@kamp.de \
    --to=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.