From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810E36E630 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id u5R3Vus7026981 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:31:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.240] (128.224.162.240) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:31:55 -0700 To: Richard Purdie , , "Wessel, Jason" , Mark Hatle References: <1466774122.3319.235.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Robert Yang Message-ID: <57709E29.2000707@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:31:53 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1466774122.3319.235.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fetch2: remove "." in the end X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 03:31:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/24/2016 09:15 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2016-06-24 at 00:55 -0700, Robert Yang wrote: >> From: Jason Wessel >> >> The filename can't be "foo." for MS Windows filesystem, it will >> renamed >> to "foo" automatically, so we can't upload sources like "foo." to the >> Windows server, remove "." in the end will fix the problem. > > This patch on its own is probably ok. What I worry about is that if I > merge this, I'll then get all the follow ups which for example force > lower or upper case everywhere, remove ":" characters from all > filenames (including sstate?), remove various other characters and so > on. > > We don't run on windows filesystems and we're not likely ever to be > able to. > > So what are we aiming for here? We don't run bitbake on windows, either. Our problem is that we put the downloaded sources on a windows server, and the filename mismatches when the name is "foo.", so it would fail to download. // Robert > > Cheers, > > Richard >