From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:48409 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752449AbcF2CBY (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2016 22:01:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] watchdog: qcom: add option for standalone watchdog not in timer block To: Matthew McClintock , twp@codeaurora.org References: <1467138921-3658-1-git-send-email-twp@codeaurora.org> <1467138921-3658-2-git-send-email-twp@codeaurora.org> <20160628194723.GA1999@roeck-us.net> <75720F79-5C72-4FFD-A391-427C5D336AE0@codeaurora.org> Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <57732BF1.3060801@roeck-us.net> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:01:21 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <75720F79-5C72-4FFD-A391-427C5D336AE0@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On 06/28/2016 02:24 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote: > >> On Jun 28, 2016, at 3:45 PM, Thomas Pedersen wrote: >> >> I'll rectify the missing documentation, and am fine with changing the name to >> kpss-core. > > I think the previous conclusion was to rename it to something with ipq4019 in the compat, but I’d suggest checking the comments in patchworks on the previous patches. > I looked up my notes. Here is what I had suggested earlier: "The property name should probably be something like 'qcom,kpss-wdt' (or 'qcom,kpss-watchdog' ?), possibly in addition to 'qcom,kpss-ipq4019-wdt' and 'qcom,kpss-msm8916-wdt'." Guenter