All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer (rev2)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:44:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5774DBE5.4010503@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160630052053.473.77185@emeril.freedesktop.org>



On 30/06/16 06:20, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer (rev2)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/9279/
> State : warning
>
> == Summary ==
>
> Series 9279v2 Series without cover letter
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/9279/revisions/2/mbox
>
> Test gem_exec_flush:
>          Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd:
>                  fail       -> PASS       (ro-byt-n2820)
> Test kms_flip:
>          Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
>                  pass       -> DMESG-WARN (ro-byt-n2820)

Looks like https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95125

> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
>          Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
>                  dmesg-warn -> SKIP       (ro-bdw-i5-5250u)
>          Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
>                  dmesg-warn -> SKIP       (ro-bdw-i5-5250u)
>
> fi-skl-i5-6260u  total:229  pass:202  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:2   skip:25
> fi-snb-i7-2600   total:229  pass:174  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:2   skip:53
> ro-bdw-i5-5250u  total:229  pass:202  dwarn:1   dfail:1   fail:2   skip:23
> ro-bdw-i7-5600u  total:229  pass:190  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:0   skip:38
> ro-bsw-n3050     total:229  pass:176  dwarn:1   dfail:1   fail:2   skip:49
> ro-byt-n2820     total:229  pass:178  dwarn:1   dfail:1   fail:4   skip:45
> ro-hsw-i3-4010u  total:229  pass:195  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:2   skip:31
> ro-hsw-i7-4770r  total:229  pass:195  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:2   skip:31
> ro-ilk-i7-620lm  total:229  pass:155  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:3   skip:70
> ro-ilk1-i5-650   total:224  pass:155  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:3   skip:65
> ro-ivb-i7-3770   total:229  pass:186  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:2   skip:40
> ro-ivb2-i7-3770  total:229  pass:190  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:2   skip:36
> ro-skl3-i5-6260u total:229  pass:206  dwarn:1   dfail:1   fail:2   skip:19
> ro-snb-i7-2620M  total:229  pass:179  dwarn:0   dfail:1   fail:1   skip:48
> fi-kbl-qkkr failed to connect after reboot
> fi-skl-i7-6700k failed to connect after reboot
> ro-bdw-i7-5557U failed to connect after reboot
>
> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_1335/
>
> 8a6521c drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-06m-29d-16h-08m-16s UTC integration manifest
> 5a0b3b6 drm/i915: Trim some if-else braces
> 6546565 drm/i915: Consolidate legacy semaphore initialization
> 7cd391c drm/i915: Compact gen8_ring_sync
> c36607f drm/i915: Compact Gen8 semaphore initialization
> e862990 drm/i915: Move semaphore object creation into intel_ring_init_semaphores
> 2168bca drm/i915: Consolidate semaphore vfuncs init
> af5b4cc drm/i915: Consolidate dispatch_execbuffer vfunc
> 0c72cfa drm/i915: Consolidate init_hw vfunc
> 2cb2fab drm/i915: Consolidate get/set_seqno
> 6e3bbdc drm/i915: Consolidate get and put irq vfuncs
> 24b7851 drm/i915: Consolidate seqno_barrier vfunc
> 0bd03a1 drm/i915: Consolidate add_request vfunc
> 42e13b2 drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer

Looks good for merge. Just one r-b missing on v3 7/13.

Regards,

Tvrtko


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

      reply	other threads:[~2016-06-30  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-29 15:09 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Consolidate add_request vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Consolidate seqno_barrier vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Consolidate get and put irq vfuncs Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Consolidate get/set_seqno Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: Consolidate init_hw vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Consolidate dispatch_execbuffer vfunc Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:40   ` [PATCH v3] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-30 15:12     ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: Consolidate semaphore vfuncs init Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Move semaphore object creation into intel_ring_init_semaphores Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:30   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Compact Gen8 semaphore initialization Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:31   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Compact gen8_ring_sync Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:33   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: Consolidate legacy semaphore initialization Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:34   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 15:41     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:00       ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 16:14         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:24           ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 16:34             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 16:43               ` Chris Wilson
2016-07-15 13:13         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-19 18:38           ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20  9:54             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-20 12:50               ` Dave Gordon
2016-07-20 16:07                 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-07-20 17:08                   ` Dave Gordon
2016-06-29 15:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Trim some if-else braces Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-29 15:35   ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-29 16:06 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer Patchwork
2016-06-30  5:20 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Consolidate write_tail vfunc initializer (rev2) Patchwork
2016-06-30  8:44   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5774DBE5.4010503@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.