From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.torgue@st.com (Alexandre Torgue) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:37:21 +0200 Subject: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/6] Add Ethernet support on STM32F429 In-Reply-To: References: <1462789899-13153-1-git-send-email-alexandre.torgue@gmail.com> <20160517.122527.1937360418899371800.davem@davemloft.net> <2535270.dCFPoM2olB@wuerfel> Message-ID: <57753CB1.3010800@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi David, On 05/18/2016 11:49 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > 2016-05-18 11:31 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : >> On Wednesday 18 May 2016 09:48:53 Maxime Coquelin wrote: >>> 2016-05-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 David Miller : >>>> From: Maxime Coquelin >>>> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 11:20:16 +0200 >>>> >>>>> Hi David, >>>>> >>>>> 2016-05-09 21:06 GMT+02:00 David Miller : >>>>>> From: Alexandre TORGUE >>>>>> Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 12:31:33 +0200 >>>>>> >>>>>>> STM32F429 Chip embeds a Synopsys 3.50a MAC IP. >>>>>>> This series: >>>>>>> -enhance current stmmac driver to control it (code already >>>>>>> available) and adds basic glue for STM32F429 chip. >>>>>>> -Enable basic Net config in kernel. >>>>>> >>>>>> I assume this will go via the ARM tree, for the networking bits: >>>>> I would expect patches 1, 2 & 3 to got via your tree, to avoid conflicts. >>>> >>>> I don't think putting them all via the ARM tree is going to create much >>>> in the way of conflicts, and right now during the merge window offloading >>>> that work from me would really help my backlog a lot. >>> >>> Ok, I understand this is not the best time to pick it. >>> >>> Arnd, Olof & Kevin, would you accept to pick the series in your tree? >>> >> >> It's too late for v4.7 for us too, please pick up the arch/arm patches >> in your normal stm32 tree and send them to us along with any other changes >> you may have, and resend the driver by itself to netdev time after the >> merge window. >> >> The binding document can go either way, with the dts changes or with >> the driver. I see no dependencies between the patches, so we just need >> to land them all in v4.8. > > Ok, this is good for me. > No problem to wait for v4.8. > I will take the arch/arm patches, and David the drivers/net/ ones once > v4.7-rc1 is out. According to this old discussion, could you please take driver patches + bindings one (patch 1/2/3) in your net-next tree ? Do you need I resend them separately ? Thanks in advance Alex From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Torgue Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/6] Add Ethernet support on STM32F429 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:37:21 +0200 Message-ID: <57753CB1.3010800@st.com> References: <1462789899-13153-1-git-send-email-alexandre.torgue@gmail.com> <20160517.122527.1937360418899371800.davem@davemloft.net> <2535270.dCFPoM2olB@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: David Miller Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Kevin Hilman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Joachim Eastwood , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Chen-Yu Tsai , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Olof Johansson , Giuseppe Cavallaro , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi David, On 05/18/2016 11:49 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > 2016-05-18 11:31 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : >> On Wednesday 18 May 2016 09:48:53 Maxime Coquelin wrote: >>> 2016-05-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 David Miller : >>>> From: Maxime Coquelin >>>> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 11:20:16 +0200 >>>> >>>>> Hi David, >>>>> >>>>> 2016-05-09 21:06 GMT+02:00 David Miller : >>>>>> From: Alexandre TORGUE >>>>>> Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 12:31:33 +0200 >>>>>> >>>>>>> STM32F429 Chip embeds a Synopsys 3.50a MAC IP. >>>>>>> This series: >>>>>>> -enhance current stmmac driver to control it (code already >>>>>>> available) and adds basic glue for STM32F429 chip. >>>>>>> -Enable basic Net config in kernel. >>>>>> >>>>>> I assume this will go via the ARM tree, for the networking bits: >>>>> I would expect patches 1, 2 & 3 to got via your tree, to avoid conflicts. >>>> >>>> I don't think putting them all via the ARM tree is going to create much >>>> in the way of conflicts, and right now during the merge window offloading >>>> that work from me would really help my backlog a lot. >>> >>> Ok, I understand this is not the best time to pick it. >>> >>> Arnd, Olof & Kevin, would you accept to pick the series in your tree? >>> >> >> It's too late for v4.7 for us too, please pick up the arch/arm patches >> in your normal stm32 tree and send them to us along with any other changes >> you may have, and resend the driver by itself to netdev time after the >> merge window. >> >> The binding document can go either way, with the dts changes or with >> the driver. I see no dependencies between the patches, so we just need >> to land them all in v4.8. > > Ok, this is good for me. > No problem to wait for v4.8. > I will take the arch/arm patches, and David the drivers/net/ ones once > v4.7-rc1 is out. According to this old discussion, could you please take driver patches + bindings one (patch 1/2/3) in your net-next tree ? Do you need I resend them separately ? Thanks in advance Alex From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932593AbcF3PiK (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:38:10 -0400 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([62.209.51.94]:52163 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932435AbcF3PiH (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:38:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/6] Add Ethernet support on STM32F429 To: David Miller References: <1462789899-13153-1-git-send-email-alexandre.torgue@gmail.com> <20160517.122527.1937360418899371800.davem@davemloft.net> <2535270.dCFPoM2olB@wuerfel> CC: Maxime Coquelin , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Kevin Hilman , Alexandre Torgue , Giuseppe Cavallaro , , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Joachim Eastwood , Chen-Yu Tsai From: Alexandre Torgue Message-ID: <57753CB1.3010800@st.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:37:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.48.0.2] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-06-30_06:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, On 05/18/2016 11:49 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > 2016-05-18 11:31 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann : >> On Wednesday 18 May 2016 09:48:53 Maxime Coquelin wrote: >>> 2016-05-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 David Miller : >>>> From: Maxime Coquelin >>>> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 11:20:16 +0200 >>>> >>>>> Hi David, >>>>> >>>>> 2016-05-09 21:06 GMT+02:00 David Miller : >>>>>> From: Alexandre TORGUE >>>>>> Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 12:31:33 +0200 >>>>>> >>>>>>> STM32F429 Chip embeds a Synopsys 3.50a MAC IP. >>>>>>> This series: >>>>>>> -enhance current stmmac driver to control it (code already >>>>>>> available) and adds basic glue for STM32F429 chip. >>>>>>> -Enable basic Net config in kernel. >>>>>> >>>>>> I assume this will go via the ARM tree, for the networking bits: >>>>> I would expect patches 1, 2 & 3 to got via your tree, to avoid conflicts. >>>> >>>> I don't think putting them all via the ARM tree is going to create much >>>> in the way of conflicts, and right now during the merge window offloading >>>> that work from me would really help my backlog a lot. >>> >>> Ok, I understand this is not the best time to pick it. >>> >>> Arnd, Olof & Kevin, would you accept to pick the series in your tree? >>> >> >> It's too late for v4.7 for us too, please pick up the arch/arm patches >> in your normal stm32 tree and send them to us along with any other changes >> you may have, and resend the driver by itself to netdev time after the >> merge window. >> >> The binding document can go either way, with the dts changes or with >> the driver. I see no dependencies between the patches, so we just need >> to land them all in v4.8. > > Ok, this is good for me. > No problem to wait for v4.8. > I will take the arch/arm patches, and David the drivers/net/ ones once > v4.7-rc1 is out. According to this old discussion, could you please take driver patches + bindings one (patch 1/2/3) in your net-next tree ? Do you need I resend them separately ? Thanks in advance Alex