From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: Query the status of SC facility lock
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:38:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <577D25F1.7040805@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467794050-32014-1-git-send-email-slava.monich@jolla.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4475 bytes --]
Hi Slava,
On 07/06/2016 03:34 AM, Slava Monich wrote:
> Otherwise "pin" entry in LockedPins may be lost after ofono is restarted.
> ---
> src/sim.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/sim.c b/src/sim.c
> index aedc617..634acfc 100644
> --- a/src/sim.c
> +++ b/src/sim.c
> @@ -2449,58 +2449,47 @@ static void sim_free_state(struct ofono_sim *sim)
> sim_free_main_state(sim);
> }
>
> -static void sim_query_fac_imsilock_cb(const struct ofono_error *error,
> - ofono_bool_t status,
> - void *data)
> +static void sim_set_locked_pin(struct ofono_sim *sim,
> + enum ofono_sim_password_type type, gboolean locked)
> {
> - struct ofono_sim *sim = data;
> - DBusConnection *conn = ofono_dbus_get_connection();
> - const char *path = __ofono_atom_get_path(sim->atom);
> - char **locked_pins;
> + if (sim->locked_pins[type] != locked) {
> + char **locked_pins;
>
I'd prefer:
if (sim->locked_pins[type] == locked)
return;
.. do stuff ..
> - if (error->type != OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_NO_ERROR) {
> - ofono_error("Querying Facility Lock for IMSI Lock failed");
> - return;
> - }
> + sim->locked_pins[type] = locked;
> + locked_pins = get_locked_pins(sim);
>
> - sim->locked_pins[OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_PHSIM_PIN] = status;
> + ofono_dbus_signal_array_property_changed(
> + ofono_dbus_get_connection(),
> + __ofono_atom_get_path(sim->atom),
> + OFONO_SIM_MANAGER_INTERFACE, "LockedPins",
> + DBUS_TYPE_STRING, &locked_pins);
>
> - locked_pins = get_locked_pins(sim);
> -
> - ofono_dbus_signal_array_property_changed(conn,
> - path,
> - OFONO_SIM_MANAGER_INTERFACE,
> - "LockedPins", DBUS_TYPE_STRING,
> - &locked_pins);
> + g_strfreev(locked_pins);
> + }
> +}
>
> - g_strfreev(locked_pins);
> +static void sim_query_fac_imsilock_cb(const struct ofono_error *error,
> + ofono_bool_t status, void *data)
> +{
> + if (error->type == OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_NO_ERROR) {
> + sim_set_locked_pin(data, OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_PHSIM_PIN, status);
> + }
This is not in-line with the Linux Kernel coding style. Also, I'd prefer:
if (error->type != OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_NO_ERROR)
return;
sim_set_locked_pin...
> }
>
> static void sim_query_fac_networklock_cb(const struct ofono_error *error,
> - ofono_bool_t status,
> - void *data)
> + ofono_bool_t status, void *data)
> {
> - struct ofono_sim *sim = data;
> - DBusConnection *conn = ofono_dbus_get_connection();
> - const char *path = __ofono_atom_get_path(sim->atom);
> - char **locked_pins;
> -
> - if (error->type != OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_NO_ERROR) {
> - ofono_error("Querying Facility Lock for Network Lock failed");
> - return;
> + if (error->type == OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_NO_ERROR) {
> + sim_set_locked_pin(data, OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_PHNET_PIN, status);
> }
> +}
as above
>
> - sim->locked_pins[OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_PHNET_PIN] = status;
> -
> - locked_pins = get_locked_pins(sim);
> -
> - ofono_dbus_signal_array_property_changed(conn,
> - path,
> - OFONO_SIM_MANAGER_INTERFACE,
> - "LockedPins", DBUS_TYPE_STRING,
> - &locked_pins);
> -
> - g_strfreev(locked_pins);
> +static void sim_query_fac_pinlock_cb(const struct ofono_error *error,
> + ofono_bool_t status, void *data)
> +{
> + if (error->type == OFONO_ERROR_TYPE_NO_ERROR) {
> + sim_set_locked_pin(data, OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_SIM_PIN, status);
> + }
as above
> }
>
> void ofono_sim_inserted_notify(struct ofono_sim *sim, ofono_bool_t inserted)
> @@ -2529,14 +2518,19 @@ void ofono_sim_inserted_notify(struct ofono_sim *sim, ofono_bool_t inserted)
> call_state_watches(sim);
>
> if (inserted) {
> - sim->driver->query_facility_lock(sim,
> + if (sim->driver->query_facility_lock) {
> + sim->driver->query_facility_lock(sim,
> OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_PHSIM_PIN,
> sim_query_fac_imsilock_cb, sim);
>
> - sim->driver->query_facility_lock(sim,
> + sim->driver->query_facility_lock(sim,
> OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_PHNET_PIN,
> sim_query_fac_networklock_cb, sim);
>
> + sim->driver->query_facility_lock(sim,
> + OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_SIM_PIN,
> + sim_query_fac_pinlock_cb, sim);
> + }
> sim_initialize(sim);
Item M1 in doc/coding-style.txt.
> } else {
> sim->pin_type = OFONO_SIM_PASSWORD_NONE;
>
Regards,
-Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-06 8:34 [PATCH] sim: Query the status of SC facility lock Slava Monich
2016-07-06 15:38 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-06 16:02 Slava Monich
2016-07-06 16:13 ` Denis Kenzior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=577D25F1.7040805@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.