From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com>
To: "linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Tutorial/git's guide to c-state counters on Intel?
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:30:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <577D5C58.20802@hpe.com> (raw)
I am presently trying to tease-out why a "slight" change in kernel
(4.4.7 to 4.4.11) might result in a large change in some VM to VM
netperf TCP_RR performance. I've seen that if I set the system firmware
to be in a static high performance mode rather than a dynamic power
management (by the firmware) mode the gap narrows considerably.
I've come across:
cstate_core/c3-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
cstate_core/c6-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
cstate_core/c7-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
cstate_pkg/c2-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
cstate_pkg/c3-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
cstate_pkg/c6-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
cstate_pkg/c7-residency/ [Kernel PMU event]
and when I count those via perf comparing the two, back in the dynamic
power managment mode, I can see more package c* residency on the slower
setup (newer kernel). That fits with the hypothesis that the slower
request/response performance is coming from going into and out of sleep
states more - something which has been known to affect the likes of a
netperf TCP_RR test for years. I don't see nearly as large a
difference between the core c* counts though, which leaves me wondering
why/how that might be.
The processors in question here are E5-2640:
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 0 @ 2.50GHz
happy benchmarking,
rick jones
reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=577D5C58.20802@hpe.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.