From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:51963 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751289AbcGIPGW (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jul 2016 11:06:22 -0400 Subject: Re: I/O address 0x0cd6 already in use To: ioanm@linux.com, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org References: <577E71D0.3030207@roeck-us.net> <20160707191600.GA9431@roeck-us.net> <577FA963.70408@roeck-us.net> <5780BCF8.8020808@roeck-us.net> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <578112E1.4010206@roeck-us.net> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 08:06:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On 07/09/2016 06:34 AM, Ioan Moldovan wrote: > How about reporting this to i2c, and asking the devs there if they > need that I/O Addr. I _did_ cc the i2c mailing list in my first reply. Remember, I asked you not to drop the mailing lists in your replies ? Guenter