From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacek Anaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: leds-gpio: Set of_node for created LED devices Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:20:13 +0200 Message-ID: <578356BD.8000309@samsung.com> References: <1467982420-15718-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <57834C06.4020506@samsung.com> <57835036.2090902@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-reply-to: <57835036.2090902@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: Richard Purdie , "open list:LED SUBSYSTEM" , open list List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org On 07/11/2016 09:52 AM, Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki wrote: > On 07/11/2016 09:34 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >> On 07/08/2016 02:53 PM, Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki wrote: >>> When working with Device Tree we iterate over children of "gpio-led= s" >>> compatible node and create LED device for each of them. We take car= e of >>> all common DT properties (label, default trigger, state, etc.), how= ever >>> some triggers may want to support more of them. >>> >>> It could be useful for timer trigger to support setting delay on/of= f >>> values with Device Tree property. Or for transient trigger to suppo= rt >>> e.g. duration property. >>> >>> We obviously should handle such properties in triggers, not in gene= ric >>> code. To let trigger drivers read properties from DT node we need t= o set >>> of_node to point the relevant node. This change allows using all ki= nd of >>> of helpers in e.g. "activate" callbacks. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki >>> --- >>> drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c | 5 +++-- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c b/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c >>> index 8229f06..9b991d4 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c >>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c >>> @@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ static struct gpio_leds_priv >>> *gpio_leds_create(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >>> >>> device_for_each_child_node(dev, child) { >>> + struct gpio_led_data *led_dat =3D &priv->leds[priv->num_le= ds]; >> >> This seems to be an unrelated change. > > We already got > &priv->leds[priv->num_leds] > and I needed to add > priv->leds[priv->num_leds].cdev.dev->of_node > > I didn't want to duplicate code accessing so deep struct, so I added = a > helper. > > Is that a good explanation? Or would you like me to change this code? Ah, I missed that. Patch applied. Thanks, Jacek Anaszewski