Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.9.1

[Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>]

On 07/11/2016 07:54 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> Yes, that's somewhat the point of the test.
>
> How does it fail for you (what does it look like with "-v")? We may be
> able to check for an outcome that matches both cases.

On Ubuntu i386 and Ubuntu armhf, I get the following verbose output from 
t0006-date.sh:


expecting success:
		echo "$time -> $expect" >expect &&
		test-date show:$format "$time" >actual &&
		test_cmp expect actual
	
--- expect	2016-07-11 23:20:55.835136188 +0000
+++ actual	2016-07-11 23:20:55.835136188 +0000
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5758122296 -0400 -> 2152-06-19 18:24:56 -0400
+5758122296 -0400 -> 2038-01-18 23:14:07 -0400
not ok 19 - show date (iso:5758122296 -0400)
#	
#			echo "$time -> $expect" >expect &&
#			test-date show:$format "$time" >actual &&
#			test_cmp expect actual
#		

expecting success:
		echo "$time -> $expect" >expect &&
		test-date show:$format "$time" >actual &&
		test_cmp expect actual
	
--- expect	2016-07-11 23:20:55.839136188 +0000
+++ actual	2016-07-11 23:20:55.839136188 +0000
@@ -1 +1 @@
-5758122296 -0400 -> 2152-06-19 22:24:56 +0000
+5758122296 -0400 -> 2038-01-19 03:14:07 +0000
not ok 20 - show date (iso-local:5758122296 -0400)


Anders