All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: AM33xx: fix module_wait_ready without clkctrl register"
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:55:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57852F25.2070001@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5784F1E2.1060605@ti.com>

On 07/12/2016 08:34 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 07/12/2016 01:27 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> On 12/07/16 06:34, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 12 July 2016 03:09 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>> This reverts commit 183e2077d007aa4b697efba095ecfea7244a6107.
>>>>
>>>> The original patch added a check to am33xx_cm_wait_module_ready for a
>>>> clkctrl offset of 0 as an invalid case, however, clkctrl offset of 0 is
>>>> perfectly valid for hwmods, in particular the rtc.
>>>
>>> Looks like a similar check is present for am33xx_cm_wait_module_idle.
>>> Shouldn't that also be removed?
>>
>> Oh this is annoying, I didn't notice that RTC had mutant register when I
>> did the patch to add the check in place, and didn't face this issue
>> either during testing. However, this check must be in there to avoid any
>> issues with the transition to the hwmod clock data, as all the clkctrl
>> offsets will be removed from hwmod data.
>>
>> I think for RTC we probably need to add some sort of HWMOD flag, and add
>> a check within the hwmod code itself against this. Just reverting this
>> patch is wrong approach, as you need to fix it some other way then.
>
> I agree, that was another option I considered, but I went with reverting
> it for now as there were no ill effects and we've made it this long with
> out it.
>
> I can send a new version with a flag soon.

Ok so let's forget this patch, new series sent here

http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=146834587516818&w=2

Regards,
Dave

>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
>>
>> -Tero
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks and regards,
>>> Lokesh
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Without reverting this patch sometimes external aborts are seen on
>>>> am335x during boot. This is due to the am33xx_cm_wait_module_ready
>>>> function immediately returning 0 rather than waiting for the
>>>> RTC_CLKCTRL
>>>> register to indicate it is actually ready before rtc register accesses
>>>> happen.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c | 3 ---
>>>>   1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c
>>>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c
>>>> index c073fb57dd13..7b181f929525 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c
>>>> @@ -220,9 +220,6 @@ static int am33xx_cm_wait_module_ready(u8 part,
>>>> s16 inst, u16 clkctrl_offs,
>>>>   {
>>>>       int i = 0;
>>>>
>>>> -    if (!clkctrl_offs)
>>>> -        return 0;
>>>> -
>>>>       omap_test_timeout(_is_module_ready(inst, clkctrl_offs),
>>>>                 MAX_MODULE_READY_TIME, i);
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: d-gerlach@ti.com (Dave Gerlach)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: AM33xx: fix module_wait_ready without clkctrl register"
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:55:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57852F25.2070001@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5784F1E2.1060605@ti.com>

On 07/12/2016 08:34 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> On 07/12/2016 01:27 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> On 12/07/16 06:34, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 12 July 2016 03:09 AM, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>> This reverts commit 183e2077d007aa4b697efba095ecfea7244a6107.
>>>>
>>>> The original patch added a check to am33xx_cm_wait_module_ready for a
>>>> clkctrl offset of 0 as an invalid case, however, clkctrl offset of 0 is
>>>> perfectly valid for hwmods, in particular the rtc.
>>>
>>> Looks like a similar check is present for am33xx_cm_wait_module_idle.
>>> Shouldn't that also be removed?
>>
>> Oh this is annoying, I didn't notice that RTC had mutant register when I
>> did the patch to add the check in place, and didn't face this issue
>> either during testing. However, this check must be in there to avoid any
>> issues with the transition to the hwmod clock data, as all the clkctrl
>> offsets will be removed from hwmod data.
>>
>> I think for RTC we probably need to add some sort of HWMOD flag, and add
>> a check within the hwmod code itself against this. Just reverting this
>> patch is wrong approach, as you need to fix it some other way then.
>
> I agree, that was another option I considered, but I went with reverting
> it for now as there were no ill effects and we've made it this long with
> out it.
>
> I can send a new version with a flag soon.

Ok so let's forget this patch, new series sent here

http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=146834587516818&w=2

Regards,
Dave

>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
>>
>> -Tero
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks and regards,
>>> Lokesh
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Without reverting this patch sometimes external aborts are seen on
>>>> am335x during boot. This is due to the am33xx_cm_wait_module_ready
>>>> function immediately returning 0 rather than waiting for the
>>>> RTC_CLKCTRL
>>>> register to indicate it is actually ready before rtc register accesses
>>>> happen.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c | 3 ---
>>>>   1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c
>>>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c
>>>> index c073fb57dd13..7b181f929525 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm33xx.c
>>>> @@ -220,9 +220,6 @@ static int am33xx_cm_wait_module_ready(u8 part,
>>>> s16 inst, u16 clkctrl_offs,
>>>>   {
>>>>       int i = 0;
>>>>
>>>> -    if (!clkctrl_offs)
>>>> -        return 0;
>>>> -
>>>>       omap_test_timeout(_is_module_ready(inst, clkctrl_offs),
>>>>                 MAX_MODULE_READY_TIME, i);
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-12 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-11 21:39 [PATCH] Revert "ARM: AM33xx: fix module_wait_ready without clkctrl register" Dave Gerlach
2016-07-11 21:39 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-07-11 21:43 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-07-11 21:43   ` Dave Gerlach
2016-07-11 21:50   ` Dave Gerlach
2016-07-11 21:50     ` Dave Gerlach
2016-07-12  3:34 ` Lokesh Vutla
2016-07-12  3:34   ` Lokesh Vutla
2016-07-12  6:27   ` Tero Kristo
2016-07-12  6:27     ` Tero Kristo
2016-07-12 13:34     ` Dave Gerlach
2016-07-12 13:34       ` Dave Gerlach
2016-07-12 17:55       ` Dave Gerlach [this message]
2016-07-12 17:55         ` Dave Gerlach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57852F25.2070001@ti.com \
    --to=d-gerlach@ti.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lokeshvutla@ti.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.