From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] clk: exynos5433: remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag from SPI clocks To: Sylwester Nawrocki , Michael Turquette References: <1468317736-18841-1-git-send-email-andi.shyti@samsung.com> <1468317736-18841-8-git-send-email-andi.shyti@samsung.com> <146836184696.73491.9452469757415968654@resonance> <578607FD.6050705@samsung.com> Cc: Andi Shyti , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Kukjin Kim , Mark Brown , Tomasz Figa , Stephen Boyd , Chanwoo Choi , Jaehoon Chung , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Andi Shyti From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Message-id: <57860FEC.3090004@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:54:52 +0200 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <578607FD.6050705@samsung.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-ID: On 07/13/2016 11:21 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 07/13/2016 12:17 AM, Michael Turquette wrote: >> >> Do you want these patches to go through same tree? If not, I can take >> this patch into clk-next. > > I think this patch can safely go separately through the clk tree, > we just need to ensure whole series is merged for same release > to avoid regressions. There should be no problems with git bisect > since there is no exynos5433 based board dts in mainline yet. Ack. Best regards, Krzysztof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] clk: exynos5433: remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag from SPI clocks Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:54:52 +0200 Message-ID: <57860FEC.3090004@samsung.com> References: <1468317736-18841-1-git-send-email-andi.shyti@samsung.com> <1468317736-18841-8-git-send-email-andi.shyti@samsung.com> <146836184696.73491.9452469757415968654@resonance> <578607FD.6050705@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <578607FD.6050705-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sylwester Nawrocki , Michael Turquette Cc: Andi Shyti , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Kukjin Kim , Mark Brown , Tomasz Figa , Stephen Boyd , Chanwoo Choi , Jaehoon Chung , linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andi Shyti List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 07/13/2016 11:21 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 07/13/2016 12:17 AM, Michael Turquette wrote: >> >> Do you want these patches to go through same tree? If not, I can take >> this patch into clk-next. > > I think this patch can safely go separately through the clk tree, > we just need to ensure whole series is merged for same release > to avoid regressions. There should be no problems with git bisect > since there is no exynos5433 based board dts in mainline yet. Ack. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:54:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] clk: exynos5433: remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag from SPI clocks In-Reply-To: <578607FD.6050705@samsung.com> References: <1468317736-18841-1-git-send-email-andi.shyti@samsung.com> <1468317736-18841-8-git-send-email-andi.shyti@samsung.com> <146836184696.73491.9452469757415968654@resonance> <578607FD.6050705@samsung.com> Message-ID: <57860FEC.3090004@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/13/2016 11:21 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 07/13/2016 12:17 AM, Michael Turquette wrote: >> >> Do you want these patches to go through same tree? If not, I can take >> this patch into clk-next. > > I think this patch can safely go separately through the clk tree, > we just need to ensure whole series is merged for same release > to avoid regressions. There should be no problems with git bisect > since there is no exynos5433 based board dts in mainline yet. Ack. Best regards, Krzysztof