From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bNNXq-0004gt-DS for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:01:58 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.149] (firewall.candelatech.com [50.251.239.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E667C40A539 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:01:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Ben Greear Subject: Anyone brought up 9984 NIC on x86-64? Message-ID: <578673DA.1010907@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:01:14 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k I added a few patches to my 4.7 kernel to enable ath10k to load for 9984, but it immediately crashes due to IOMMU error when trying to allocate memory. I'm building the latest linux-ath tree now and will test that when it is done, but I am curious to know if anyone has successfully booted 9984 on x86-64? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k