From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A4893E00E72; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:44:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [74.55.86.74 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F151E00CC0 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (c-73-160-101-18.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [73.160.101.18]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB782104342; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 03:43:58 +0000 (UTC) To: Otavio Salvador , Ting Liu References: <1467628945-29293-1-git-send-email-ting.liu@nxp.com> <1467628945-29293-2-git-send-email-ting.liu@nxp.com> From: "Robert E. Cochran" Message-ID: <57870A90.4070904@mindchasers.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 23:44:16 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Lauren Post , Weng White-B18292 Subject: Re: [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 01/67] remove not supported e500v2 machines X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 03:44:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/13/2016 06:56 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Ting Liu wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br] >>> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:39 PM >>> To: Ting Liu >>> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org >>> Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-freescale-layer][PATCH 01/67] remove >>> not supported e500v2 machines >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:41 AM, wrote: >>>> From: Ting Liu >>>> >>>> Remove the below machines which are not supported/tested: >>>> bsc9131rdb, bsc9132qds, p1010rdb, p1020rdb, p1021rdb, p1022ds >>>> p1023rdb, p1025twr, p2020rdb >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ting Liu >>> i understand why you are doing this but I don't support this. There are users >>> out there using those and as such NXP should keep those supported. We use >>> same rule for i.MX and what we do is moving the old BSP machines for >>> mainline kernel/u-boot so people has at least an upgrade path. >> [Liu Ting-B28495] I understand your points. But these boards are not tested with the latest kernel/u-boot/fm-ucode/qe-ucode/etc. >> We want to remove them to avoid confusion. >> >> It is easy to add back the machine configuration files. The recipes for kernel/u-boot/etc. should be rolled back to the previous revision on which these boards are supported too. Anyway, this need effort to verify, including build and function. > I am not the owner of those machines, on the BSP, so I cannot block > the removal. For the i.MX I always preferred to move the machines for > the mainline kernel/u-boot and keep them around so people could use > and improve them. This was a way to empower the community and provide > a long term solution for our users. Once things stabilize, I would like to patch back in support for the p1010rdb and t1040rdb-64b. Let me know if there is an objection to this. >