From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 2DAE6E00CD8; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:38:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail.analogue-micro.com (mail.analogue-micro.com [217.144.149.242]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2323E0095F for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.analogue-micro.com (Postfix, from userid 999) id D496968A019; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 15:38:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from zeus.mlbassoc.com (unknown [10.8.0.2]) by mail.analogue-micro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F81E68A019; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 15:38:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.mlbassoc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAD36740287; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:38:04 +0200 (CEST) To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org References: From: Gary Thomas Message-ID: <5787A3CC.9090205@mlbassoc.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:38:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: One rpm for all kernel modules X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:38:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2016-07-14 16:25, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Prasant J wrote: >> I'm building my custom layer for imx6 boards. When the kernel is >> built, a lot of rpms are generated: kernel image rpm + kernel module >> rpms. >> >> Is it possible to have only 1 rpm for kernel modules (instead of >> having an rpm for each module)? > > Check the kernel-modules-split class :-) > What about just kernel-modules? That will include all kernel modules that are built with the kernel recipe, but not any modules that are added on later. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------