From: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] waitpid06: use the new API
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 18:03:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5787A9C5.4000702@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160712135104.GC2651@rei.suse.cz>
Hi!
On 07/12/2016 04:51 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> I'd like to update those waitpid* test cases utilizing wait_for_parent()
>> to use the checkpoint interface. It requires converting them for the
>> new LTP API. This, in turn, drops UCLINUX support. However, since nobody
>> has replied to:
>>
>> http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2016-May/001752.html
>>
>> it (dropping UCLINUX) seems to be acceptable. Right?
>
> I've even tried to subscribe to the uClinux-dev mailing list but it
> looks like nobody manages it anymore. So I guess that we may start
> dropping support for it.
>
>> -static void setup_sigint(void)
>> -{
>> - if ((sig_t) signal(SIGINT, inthandlr) == SIG_ERR) {
>> - tst_resm(TFAIL, "signal SIGINT failed. " "errno = %d", errno);
>> - exit(-1);
>> + pid = SAFE_FORK();
>> + if (pid == 0) {
>> + do_child_1();
>> + } else {
>> + SAFE_WAITPID(pid, &status, 0);
>> + if (WEXITSTATUS(status) != 0)
>> + tst_res(TFAIL, "Child returned bad status");
>> + else
>> + tst_res(TPASS, "Child returned good status");
>
> Hmm, I guess that there is no reason for this indirection anymore. We
> can just start MAXKIDS processes directly from the test() function.
From the code:
if (kid_count == (MAXKIDS / 2))
group2 = setpgrp();
it seems that the author wanted to have the first 4 children be in one
process group, and the other 4 children - in another. I don't know why
he/she needed that though.
If we start MAXKIDS directly from the test() function they all will be
in one process group - the process group of the process executing the
test() function.
So I'd keep the current scheme.
>
> Otherwise it looks good.
>
Thanks for the review.
Having a fresh look at this, I found a few additional things:
* I don't handle the situation when setpgrp() fails
* group1 is not used, so is a candidate for removal
* types for group2, fork_kid_pid, wait_kid_pid should be pid_t
I'll update the patch and send a new version tomorrow.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-14 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-07 15:08 [LTP] [PATCH] waitpid06: use the new API Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2016-07-12 13:51 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-07-14 15:03 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5787A9C5.4000702@oracle.com \
--to=stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.