Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] rbd: reload ceph config for block device

[Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2225 bytes --]

On 07/14/2016 02:53 PM, Vaibhav Bhembre wrote:
> Thanks Eric!

meta-comment - your mailer's default quoting behavior makes it very hard
to read your replies.  Observe:

> 
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 07/14/2016 01:32 PM, Vaibhav Bhembre wrote:
>>> This patch adds ability to reload ceph configuration for an attached RBD
>>> block device. This is necessary for the cases where rebooting a VM and/or
>>> detaching-reattaching a RBD drive is not an easy option.
>>
>> Probably worth including qemu-block@nongnu.org if you resend this. I've
>> added them in cc now, per the output of:
>>  scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f block/rbd
>>
>>>
>>> The reload mechanism relies on the bdrv_reopen_* calls to provide a
>> transactional
>>> guarantee (using 2PC) for pulling in new configuration parameters. In
>> the _prepare

Your mailer wrapped your lines but used inconsistent prefix when doing
so, which makes attribution of the lines difficult (some start with
'>>>', which traces to you, some start with '>>' which traces to me) (of
course, this is after my mailer has added yet another round of >
prefixing, but at least I know my mailer [Thunderbird] has sane quoting
behavior for the most part).

...
>>> +# Since: 2.7
>>
>> v1 was posted June 17, before soft freeze on June 28, so this may still
>> make hard freeze if someone picks it up before hard freeze on July 19.
>> But we're getting close.
>>
>> ​Hoping so! ​
> 

Here, both my text ("But we're getting close") and your text ("Hoping
so!") are prefixed with the same '>>' prefix, which makes it sound like
I wrote your reply.


>> We may want to rebase this on top of Kevin's series that adds
>> qmp_get_root_bs()
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-07/msg03086.html
>>
>> ​This is exactly what I need. Should I wait for other reviews before
> making this change or should I push it right-away?

and here, half your paragraph is attributed to me (prefix of '>>') while
only the second half is attributed to you (prefix of '>').

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]