From: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Huawei Xie <huawei.xie@intel.com>,
Rich Lane <rich.lane@bigswitch.com>,
Dyasly Sergey <s.dyasly@samsung.com>,
Heetae Ahn <heetae82.ahn@samsung.com>,
Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vhost: fix segfault on bad descriptor address
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:23:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57888F60.4090206@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160715061724.GD5146@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
On 15.07.2016 09:17, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:18:39AM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> In current implementation vhost will crash with segmentation fault
>> if malicious or buggy virtio application breaks addresses of descriptors.
>>
>> Before commit 0823c1cb0a73 this crash was reproducible even with
>> normal DPDK application that tries to change number of virtqueues
>> dynamically inside VM.
>>
>> Fix that by checking addresses of descriptors before using.
>>
>> Also fixed return value on error for 'copy_mbuf_to_desc_mergeable()'
>> from '-1' to '0' because it returns unsigned value and it means
>> number of used descriptors.
>
> Yeah, that's a good fix. Thanks.
>
> Maybe you'd better make it a standalone patch.
Ok. Maybe I should split this patch in two:
1. Fix return value + using of this value (vq->last_used_idx += nr_used;)
2. Check addresses of descriptors.
What do you think?
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> Version 2:
>> * Rebased on top of current master.
>> * host's address now checked in meargeable case,
>> because needed refactoring already done.
>> * Commit-message changed because old issue with
>> virtio reload accidentially fixed by commit
>> 0823c1cb0a73.
>>
>> lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c
>> index 15ca956..31e8b58 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c
>> @@ -147,10 +147,10 @@ copy_mbuf_to_desc(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf virtio_hdr = {{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 0};
>>
>> desc = &vq->desc[desc_idx];
>> - if (unlikely(desc->len < dev->vhost_hlen))
>> + desc_addr = gpa_to_vva(dev, desc->addr);
>> + if (unlikely(desc->len < dev->vhost_hlen || !desc_addr))
>> return -1;
>
> So, you discards the workaround from Rich?
I can apply it, if you wish. Should I?
>>
>> - desc_addr = gpa_to_vva(dev, desc->addr);
>> rte_prefetch0((void *)(uintptr_t)desc_addr);
>>
>> virtio_enqueue_offload(m, &virtio_hdr.hdr);
>> @@ -182,7 +182,10 @@ copy_mbuf_to_desc(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> return -1;
>>
>> desc = &vq->desc[desc->next];
>> - desc_addr = gpa_to_vva(dev, desc->addr);
>> + desc_addr = gpa_to_vva(dev, desc->addr);
>> + if (unlikely(!desc_addr))
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> desc_offset = 0;
>> desc_avail = desc->len;
>> }
>> @@ -387,10 +390,10 @@ copy_mbuf_to_desc_mergeable(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>> LOG_DEBUG(VHOST_DATA, "(%d) current index %d | end index %d\n",
>> dev->vid, cur_idx, end_idx);
>>
>> - if (buf_vec[vec_idx].buf_len < dev->vhost_hlen)
>> - return -1;
>> -
>> desc_addr = gpa_to_vva(dev, buf_vec[vec_idx].buf_addr);
>> + if (buf_vec[vec_idx].buf_len < dev->vhost_hlen || !desc_addr)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> rte_prefetch0((void *)(uintptr_t)desc_addr);
>>
>> virtio_hdr.num_buffers = end_idx - start_idx;
>> @@ -425,6 +428,8 @@ copy_mbuf_to_desc_mergeable(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>>
>> vec_idx++;
>> desc_addr = gpa_to_vva(dev, buf_vec[vec_idx].buf_addr);
>> + if (unlikely(!desc_addr))
>> + return 0;
>>
>> /* Prefetch buffer address. */
>> rte_prefetch0((void *)(uintptr_t)desc_addr);
>> @@ -507,7 +512,7 @@ virtio_dev_merge_rx(struct virtio_net *dev, uint16_t queue_id,
>> *(volatile uint16_t *)&vq->used->idx += nr_used;
>> vhost_log_used_vring(dev, vq, offsetof(struct vring_used, idx),
>> sizeof(vq->used->idx));
>> - vq->last_used_idx = end;
>> + vq->last_used_idx += nr_used;
>
> Ditto, this may deserve another patch, too.
>
> --yliu
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-15 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-20 12:50 [PATCH] vhost: fix segfault on bad descriptor address Ilya Maximets
2016-05-23 10:57 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-05-23 11:04 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-05-30 11:05 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-05-30 14:25 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-05-31 9:12 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-05-30 12:00 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-05-30 12:24 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-05-31 6:53 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-05-31 9:10 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-05-31 22:06 ` Rich Lane
2016-06-02 10:46 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-06-02 16:22 ` Rich Lane
2016-06-03 6:01 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-07-01 7:35 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-06 11:19 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-07-06 12:24 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-08 11:48 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-07-10 13:17 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-11 8:38 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-11 9:50 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-07-11 11:05 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-11 11:47 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-07-12 2:43 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-12 5:53 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-07-13 7:34 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-07-13 8:47 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-13 15:54 ` Rich Lane
2016-07-14 1:42 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-14 4:38 ` Ilya Maximets
2016-07-14 8:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Ilya Maximets
2016-07-15 6:17 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-15 7:23 ` Ilya Maximets [this message]
2016-07-15 8:40 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-15 11:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Ilya Maximets
2016-07-15 11:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] vhost: fix using of bad return value on mergeable enqueue Ilya Maximets
2016-07-15 11:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] vhost: do sanity check for ring descriptor address Ilya Maximets
2016-07-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] vhost: fix segfault on bad " Yuanhan Liu
2016-07-15 19:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57888F60.4090206@samsung.com \
--to=i.maximets@samsung.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=heetae82.ahn@samsung.com \
--cc=huawei.xie@intel.com \
--cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
--cc=rich.lane@bigswitch.com \
--cc=s.dyasly@samsung.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.