From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id E9F26E00EF7; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:11:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail.analogue-micro.com (mail.analogue-micro.com [217.144.149.242]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DEEE00E21 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:11:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.analogue-micro.com (Postfix, from userid 999) id 6625A68A01C; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 08:11:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from zeus.mlbassoc.com (unknown [10.8.0.2]) by mail.analogue-micro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B7768A019; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 08:11:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.mlbassoc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FAA6740173; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:11:53 +0200 (CEST) To: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" From: Gary Thomas Message-ID: <5791C738.5030308@mlbassoc.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:11:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [meta-fsl-arm] Myriad of kernel recipes X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 07:11:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Can someone explain all of the different kernel choices found in meta-fsl-arm? $ ls meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/*.bb meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_4.6.bb meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-imx_4.1-1.0.x.bb meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-imx-rt_4.1-1.0.x.bb meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx_4.1.15.bb meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-mfgtool_4.1.15.bb meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ls1_3.12.bb I build for [my own] i.MX6Q/i.MX6DL/i.MX6Solo/i.MX6UL boards. Which of the meta-fsl-arm recipes might be the best to follow/use? n.b. I've been using the Boundary Devices versions from meta-fsl-arm-extra because I also have a SabreLite (now replaced by Nitrogen6x), but I'm happy to switch if it makes sense. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------