From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: DAN LI <li.dan@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LTP list <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH V2] semctl01.c: Pass the correct parameter
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 03:11:21 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <579338756.5630570.1369206681507.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519C24C9.9070807@cn.fujitsu.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "DAN LI" <li.dan@cn.fujitsu.com>
> To: "LTP list" <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Cc: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2013 3:52:09 AM
> Subject: [LTP] [PATCH V2] semctl01.c: Pass the correct parameter
>
>
> For SEM_STAT, the semid argument is not a semaphore identifier, but instead
> an
> index into the kernel’s internal array that maintains information about all
> semaphore sets on the system.
>
> Pass a correct index of the kernel' internal array intead of a semaphores id
> when
> testing feature SEM_STAT.
>
> Signed-off-by: DAN LI <li.dan@cn.fujitsu.com>
Looks good to me. sem_index == 0 would work too, I'm assuming you
went with hidx as a corner case, which is also valid value.
Reviewed-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Regards,
Jan
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/semctl/semctl01.c | 37
> ++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/semctl/semctl01.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/semctl/semctl01.c
> index 687d909..0399842 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/semctl/semctl01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/semctl/semctl01.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ char *TCID = "semctl01";
> int TST_TOTAL = 13;
>
> static int sem_id_1 = -1;
> +static int sem_index;
>
> static int sync_pipes[2];
>
> @@ -100,25 +101,26 @@ static int sem_op;
> #endif
>
> static struct test_case_t {
> + int *semid;
> int semnum;
> int cmd;
> void (*func_test) ();
> union semun arg;
> void (*func_setup) ();
> } TC[] = {
> - {0, IPC_STAT, func_stat, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> - {0, IPC_SET, func_set, SEMUN_CAST & buf, set_setup},
> - {0, GETALL, func_gall, SEMUN_CAST array, NULL},
> - {SEM4, GETNCNT, func_cnt, SEMUN_CAST & buf, cnt_setup},
> - {SEM2, GETPID, func_pid, SEMUN_CAST & buf, pid_setup},
> - {SEM2, GETVAL, func_gval, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> - {SEM4, GETZCNT, func_cnt, SEMUN_CAST & buf, cnt_setup},
> - {0, SETALL, func_sall, SEMUN_CAST array, sall_setup},
> - {SEM4, SETVAL, func_sval, SEMUN_CAST INCVAL, NULL},
> - {0, IPC_INFO, func_iinfo, SEMUN_CAST & ipc_buf, NULL},
> - {0, SEM_INFO, func_sinfo, SEMUN_CAST & ipc_buf, NULL},
> - {0, SEM_STAT, func_sstat, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> - {0, IPC_RMID, func_rmid, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, IPC_STAT, func_stat, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, IPC_SET, func_set, SEMUN_CAST & buf, set_setup},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, GETALL, func_gall, SEMUN_CAST array, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, SEM4, GETNCNT, func_cnt, SEMUN_CAST & buf, cnt_setup},
> + {&sem_id_1, SEM2, GETPID, func_pid, SEMUN_CAST & buf, pid_setup},
> + {&sem_id_1, SEM2, GETVAL, func_gval, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, SEM4, GETZCNT, func_cnt, SEMUN_CAST & buf, cnt_setup},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, SETALL, func_sall, SEMUN_CAST array, sall_setup},
> + {&sem_id_1, SEM4, SETVAL, func_sval, SEMUN_CAST INCVAL, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, IPC_INFO, func_iinfo, SEMUN_CAST & ipc_buf, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, SEM_INFO, func_sinfo, SEMUN_CAST & ipc_buf, NULL},
> + {&sem_index, 0, SEM_STAT, func_sstat, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, IPC_RMID, func_rmid, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> };
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> @@ -162,7 +164,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> }
> }
>
> - TEST(semctl(sem_id_1, TC[i].semnum, TC[i].cmd,
> + TEST(semctl(*(TC[i].semid), TC[i].semnum, TC[i].cmd,
> TC[i].arg));
>
> if (TEST_RETURN == -1) {
> @@ -560,10 +562,13 @@ static void func_rmid(void)
>
> static void func_iinfo(int hidx)
> {
> - if (hidx >= 0)
> + if (hidx >= 0) {
> + sem_index = hidx;
> tst_resm(TPASS, "the highest index is correct");
> - else
> + } else {
> + sem_index = 0;
> tst_resm(TFAIL, "the highest index is incorrect");
> + }
> }
>
> static void func_sinfo(void)
> --
> 1.8.1
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-22 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-22 1:52 [LTP] [PATCH V2] semctl01.c: Pass the correct parameter DAN LI
2013-05-22 7:11 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2013-05-22 8:56 ` Wanlong Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=579338756.5630570.1369206681507.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=li.dan@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.