From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Mick Subject: Re: Clean up your branches! :) (was: Re: ceph branch status) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:43:49 -0700 Message-ID: <57964FD5.4040105@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57933 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752169AbcGYRnu (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:43:50 -0400 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42F4364D0B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:43:50 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gregory Farnum Cc: ceph-devel On 07/25/2016 10:39 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > 2016-07-25 10:34 GMT-07:00 Dan Mick : >> There are an awful lot of *very* old branches on this list. >> >> Do we really still need all these refs? and do they need to be public? > > This email is supposed to nag people into cleaning up but it doesn't > seem to be working very well. I did mine last week but it'd been > several months before that. I imagine some of us are just filtering > them away, given the branch lists... :) Yep. Trying some consciousness raising.