diff for duplicates of <579F4BD5.9060300@zoho.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index fde3fd7..8113e44 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ On 08/01/2016 07:24 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >> On 08/01/2016 05:50 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>> On 1 August 2016 at 11:42, zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com> wrote: >>> Couldn't we simply do this instead? ->> this solution maybe better, my reason as follows? +>> this solution maybe better, my reason as follows： >> ->> 1?it can achieve our original purpose, namely, checking whether fdt +>> 1，it can achieve our original purpose, namely, checking whether fdt >> header is corrupted before fetching fdt size field; good fdt header can >> ensure good fdt size field included more rightly than only a magic filed >> normally @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ acess field size_dt_struct too, this condition is regarded as good fdt header to return 0; } ->> 2?it is more portable; we only need to call fdt_check_header() and don't +>> 2，it is more portable; we only need to call fdt_check_header() and don't >> care about fdt header filed layout; moreover,fdt module is another independent >> module and arm64 only uses it and should not depend on more details of fdt >> such as size and magic fields locate within the first MIN_FDT_ALIGN bytes; diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 8566904..3025baa 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,10 +2,22 @@ "ref\0CAKv+Gu9QQdncCD_T8+tpdVP8qx=EKM9-PGLvb8J9RNA2qHddFw@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\0579F2BA6.1010203@zoho.com\0" "ref\020160801112450.GD11119@leverpostej\0" - "From\0zijun_hu@zoho.com (zijun_hu)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region\0" + "From\0zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region\0" "Date\0Mon, 1 Aug 2016 21:17:09 +0800\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>\0" + "Cc\0Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>" + Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> + Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> + Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org> + Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> + Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> + tj@kernel.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + stable@vger.kernel.org <stable@vger.kernel.org> + Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> + " zijun_hu@htc.com\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 08/01/2016 07:24 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:\n" @@ -13,9 +25,9 @@ ">> On 08/01/2016 05:50 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:\n" ">>> On 1 August 2016 at 11:42, zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com> wrote:\n" ">>> Couldn't we simply do this instead?\n" - ">> this solution maybe better, my reason as follows?\n" + ">> this solution maybe better, my reason as follows\357\274\232\n" ">>\n" - ">> 1?it can achieve our original purpose, namely, checking whether fdt\n" + ">> 1\357\274\214it can achieve our original purpose, namely, checking whether fdt\n" ">> header is corrupted before fetching fdt size field; good fdt header can\n" ">> ensure good fdt size field included more rightly than only a magic filed\n" ">> normally\n" @@ -65,7 +77,7 @@ "\treturn 0;\n" "}\n" "\n" - ">> 2?it is more portable; we only need to call fdt_check_header() and don't\n" + ">> 2\357\274\214it is more portable; we only need to call fdt_check_header() and don't\n" ">> care about fdt header filed layout; moreover,fdt module is another independent\n" ">> module and arm64 only uses it and should not depend on more details of fdt\n" ">> such as size and magic fields locate within the first MIN_FDT_ALIGN bytes;\n" @@ -90,4 +102,4 @@ "> Mark.\n" > -7ae4cbe584d32a7befbcc57e05d85f683859ebd0443389bdfaeec4913e7aed7b +0364e54092cb298441305036908afd2c7a919d0c80883cb0abfd9c6b1a1b0352
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.