From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bX3vJ-0005iW-UK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 06:06:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bX3vH-0003t7-UJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 06:06:12 -0400 Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:24083 helo=relay.sw.ru) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bX3vH-0003st-IG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 06:06:11 -0400 References: <1470506994-36251-1-git-send-email-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <20160809085023.GA5030@noname.str.redhat.com> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Message-ID: <57A9AB03.6040400@virtuozzo.com> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:05:55 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160809085023.GA5030@noname.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iotest 055: refactor and speed up List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, den@openvz.org, famz@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com On 09.08.2016 11:50, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 06.08.2016 um 20:09 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: >> Source disk is created and filled with test data before each test case. >> Instead initialize it once for the whole unit. >> >> performance: >> qcow2: 25s -> 15s >> raw: 16s -> 11s >> >> Actually, changed only TestSetSpeed: before this patch it used different >> image_len and data pattern. >> Alse TestSetSpeed used different image_len for source and target (by >> mistake) - this is automatically fixed here. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy > This doesn't work on top of my block-next branch. The compressed backup > patches add a class which still deletes test.img in its teardown, so any > following tests fail. Can you rebase, please? > > Kevin No problem, ok. -- Best regards, Vladimir