From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ? Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 16:43:25 +0200 Message-ID: <57B71B0D.1010202@dachary.org> References: <57B698D0.1050409@dachary.org> <20160819130529.GC17630@gmail.com> <57B708D0.4030109@dachary.org> <20160819140151.GD17630@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:37870 "EHLO relay5-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754099AbcHSOn5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:43:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160819140151.GD17630@gmail.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mykola Golub Cc: Ceph Development On 19/08/2016 16:01, Mykola Golub wrote: > "convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates" is a > part of this PR: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10462 > > which fixes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16478 and was going to be > backported too: > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16903 > > I would prefer if we merged all necessary commits to resolve the > conflict. This would ease further backporting. That makes sense. > I can try to prepare a backport PR this weekend. It would be great, thank you ! > Do we have a deadline? Not yet. Given this blocks a few rbd backports, it would be good to wait until it is resolved anyway. Cheers > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Mykola, >> >> On 19/08/2016 15:05, Mykola Golub wrote: >>> Loic, >>> >>> I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel >>> before the release: >>> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654 >>> >>> I have just merged Jason's PR to master. >> >> I created the backport and tried to cherry-pick but running into a conflict that is caused (I think) by the templatization >> >> librbd: convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates >> >> Should the templatization and all it entails be backported ? Or should the conflict be resolved by adapting the code to the non template jewel form ? >> >> Your help would be much appreciated in that matter and I assigned http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17080#note-2 to you for that reason. If you don't have time to deal with this, please let me know and unassign yourself. >> >> Cheers >> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>> Hi Sage, >>>> >>>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518 >>>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96 >>>> >>>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>> >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre