From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: CephFS and the next jewel release v10.2.3 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:59:53 +0200 Message-ID: <57BC1089.9080209@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from slow1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.86]:44806 "EHLO slow1-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757601AbcHWJBD (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 05:01:03 -0400 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.194]) by slow1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBAC47B972 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:00:58 +0200 (CEST) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: John Spray Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek Varshney , Gregory Farnum Hi John, The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-30 except for three valgrind failures). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? Cheers P.S. CC'ing Greg because John is on vacation, in case a decision is to be made before he returns. -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre