From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:34:18 +0200 Message-ID: <57BC50DA.5040804@dachary.org> References: <57BC0D5F.5050006@dachary.org> <57BC4BB1.2090803@dachary.org> <57BC5064.1030109@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from slow1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.86]:42565 "EHLO slow1-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752059AbcHWNmr (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:42:47 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by slow1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717DF47A9A9 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:35:24 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <57BC5064.1030109@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: dillaman@redhat.com Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek Varshney The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32 On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote: > The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. > > On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) >> >> Cheers >> >> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >>> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >>> >>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >>> I would also like to include the following which already have open >>> PRs: >>> >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >>> >>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>> Hi Jason, >>>> >>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>>> >>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre