From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:07:53 +0200 Message-ID: <57BD47C9.2080704@dachary.org> References: <57BC0D5F.5050006@dachary.org> <57BC4BB1.2090803@dachary.org> <57BC5064.1030109@dachary.org> <57BC50DA.5040804@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:44452 "EHLO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753267AbcHXHI0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2016 03:08:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: dillaman@redhat.com Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek Varshney It is running at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-24_06:41:40-rbd-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/ On 23/08/2016 15:35, Jason Dillaman wrote: > OK -- in that case, feel free to kick off an rbd test run after it > builds. If it ends up being after-hours, let me know and I can kick > it off. > > Thanks > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: >> The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32 >> >> On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. >>> >>> On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >>>>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >>>>> >>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >>>>> >>>>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >>>>> I would also like to include the following which already have open >>>>> PRs: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >>>>> >>>>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>> >>>>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > > > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre