From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
To: Casey Bodley <cbodley@redhat.com>,
Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <yehuda@redhat.com>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Abhishek Varshney <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>
Subject: Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.3
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:34:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57BF5668.20707@dachary.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6315ff7a-e766-6d21-539f-cff31cf124bd@redhat.com>
Hi Casey,
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16696
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16702
were merged right now via
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10845
the remaining two have been tested and await approval
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10662
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10660
A dozen other pull requests could also be merged if you'd like since they passed a rgw run.
Cheers
On 24/08/2016 19:32, Casey Bodley wrote:
>
> On 08/24/2016 12:41 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>> Hey Casey,
>>
>> are all the multisite fixes we wanted in?
>
> There are still a few pending backport, including 3 in particular that fix segfaults:
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16901
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16864
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16696
>
> It looks like that last one is blocked by conflicts with the tenant support backport in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16702. I'll rebase that one and open a PR.
>
> Casey
>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Yehuda,
>>>
>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-27 except for two failures). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> --
>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-25 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-23 9:01 rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.3 Loic Dachary
2016-08-24 16:41 ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub
2016-08-24 17:32 ` Casey Bodley
2016-08-25 20:34 ` Loic Dachary [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57BF5668.20707@dachary.org \
--to=loic@dachary.org \
--cc=abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com \
--cc=cbodley@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yehuda@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.