From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:35486 "EHLO mail-wm0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751062AbcH2HZg (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 03:25:36 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f65so65979318wmi.0 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Crash in btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate during mount To: Chris Mason , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <57A473B0.2040203@kyup.com> <657b7978-1d08-f052-8ebc-f061ecb542d0@fb.com> <57A863C6.5060503@kyup.com> <57A89583.6070600@kyup.com> Cc: SiteGround Operations From: Nikolay Borisov Message-ID: <57C3E34F.30804@kyup.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:25:03 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/08/2016 05:24 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > On 08/08/2016 10:21 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >> >> >> On 08/08/2016 05:16 PM, Chris Mason wrote: >>> >>> Fantastic, thanks again for digging through it. Making the patch is >>> much easier than testing the patch in this case. If you can trigger >>> this semi-reliably, we can add some debugging to make sure we're not >>> papering over some other problem. >> >> I don;'t have a reproducer per-se, but I have a fair number of servers, >> whose workload causes the issue, so if I patch btrfs and apply it to >> 5-10 server I;d expect at least one of them to show what the real >> issue is. >> > > Ok, I'll try and get a patch out before my vacation on Wednesday. Thanks! Ping > > -chris