From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: rados and the next jewel release v10.2.3 Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:00:37 +0200 Message-ID: <57C44E15.3030304@dachary.org> References: <57BC0FD5.2080407@dachary.org> <57BF0798.5060302@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:43675 "EHLO relay6-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757417AbcH2PAo (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:00:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <57BF0798.5060302@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Samuel Just Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek Varshney For the record, Kefu said today that in his opinion no important backports are missing at the moment On 25/08/2016 16:58, Loic Dachary wrote: > For the record, you agreed today that nothing is missing according to you. But you advised to ask Kefu's input. > > On 23/08/2016 10:56, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Sam, >> >> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rados suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-26 except for one known bug http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >> >> Cheers >> > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre