From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@gmail.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Mark Haswell Power Control Unit as having non-compliant BARs
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:12:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57C7100D.3010407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL-B5D1Jb9QGimAar-wojBp--A3TriVtAe_MeZ7vYAOsPyrqsQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/31/2016 12:46 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
>> The Haswell Power Control Unit has a non-PCI register (CONFIG_TDP_NOMINAL)
>> where BAR 0 is supposed to be. This is erratum HSE43 in the spec update
>> referenced below:
>>
>> The PCIe* Base Specification indicates that Configuration Space Headers
>> have a base address register at offset 0x10. Due to this erratum, the
>> Power Control Unit's CONFIG_TDP_NOMINAL CSR (Bus 1; Device 30; Function
>> 3; Offset 0x10) is located where a base register is expected.
>>
>> Mark the PCU as having non-compliant BARs so we don't try to probe any of
>> them. There are no other BARs on this device.
>>
>> Rename the quirk so it's not Broadwell-specific.
>
> While it's not a big enough battle to fight it sure is irritating to
> see vendors make the same mistakes over and over again. Wondering if
> this an error on the respective vendor's BIOS team's part or is this
> is just being inherited over and over again from Intel's Premier BIOS
> team reference code?
>
This isn't a BIOS issue. The actual hardware is manufactured this
way, and the documentation indicates that the hardware has
non-compliant BARs.
Testing and reviewing now ...
P.
>>
>> Link: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e5-v3-spec-update.html
>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153881
>> Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/pci/fixup.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/fixup.c b/arch/x86/pci/fixup.c
>> index 837ea36..6d52b94 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/pci/fixup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/fixup.c
>> @@ -553,15 +553,21 @@ static void twinhead_reserve_killing_zone(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x27B9, twinhead_reserve_killing_zone);
>>
>> /*
>> - * Broadwell EP Home Agent BARs erroneously return non-zero values when read.
>> + * Device [8086:2fc0]
>> + * Erratum HSE43
>> + * CONFIG_TDP_NOMINAL CSR Implemented at Incorrect Offset
>> + * http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e5-v3-spec-update.html
>> *
>> - * See http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e5-v4-spec-update.html
>> - * entry BDF2.
>> + * Devices [8086:6f60,6fa0,6fc0]
>> + * Erratum BDF2
>> + * PCI BARs in the Home Agent Will Return Non-Zero Values During Enumeration
>> + * http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e5-v4-spec-update.html
>> */
>> -static void pci_bdwep_bar(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +static void pci_invalid_bar(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> {
>> dev->non_compliant_bars = 1;
>> }
>> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f60, pci_bdwep_bar);
>> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6fa0, pci_bdwep_bar);
>> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6fc0, pci_bdwep_bar);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x2fc0, pci_invalid_bar);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f60, pci_invalid_bar);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6fa0, pci_invalid_bar);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6fc0, pci_invalid_bar);
>>
>
> Acked-by: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-31 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-31 15:50 [PATCH] PCI: Mark Haswell Power Control Unit as having non-compliant BARs Bjorn Helgaas
2016-08-31 16:46 ` Myron Stowe
2016-08-31 17:12 ` Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2016-08-31 17:45 ` Myron Stowe
2016-08-31 17:42 ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-08-31 17:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-09-01 13:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57C7100D.3010407@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myron.stowe@gmail.com \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.