From: dave.long@linaro.org (David Long)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] arm64:ftrace: add save_stack_trace_regs()
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:38:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57C891BC.7030502@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f7d7a6bff7f06f814bf9a2bdc90bb0e3b833b66.1472734699.git.panand@redhat.com>
On 09/01/2016 09:35 AM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> Implement save_stack_trace_regs, so that stacktrace of a kprobe events can be
> obtained.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
> ---
> V1 to V2: Rebased to latest kernel.
>
> I see following stack trace for kprobe at xhci_irq():
>
> echo stacktrace > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_options
> echo "p xhci_irq" > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/enable
> more /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
>
> <idle>-0 [004] d.h. 1356.000496: p_xhci_irq_0:(xhci_irq+0x0/0x9ac)
> <idle>-0 [004] d.h. 1356.000497: <stack trace>
> => xhci_irq
> => __handle_irq_event_percpu
> => handle_irq_event_percpu
> => handle_irq_event
> => handle_fasteoi_irq
> => generic_handle_irq
> => __handle_domain_irq
> => gic_handle_irq
> => el1_irq
> => arch_cpu_idle
> => default_idle_call
> => cpu_startup_entry
> => secondary_start_kernel
> =>
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index d9751a4769e7..bd6d9d8087f0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -152,6 +152,24 @@ static int save_trace(struct stackframe *frame, void *d)
> return trace->nr_entries >= trace->max_entries;
> }
>
> +void save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace)
> +{
> + struct stack_trace_data data;
> + struct stackframe frame;
> +
> + data.trace = trace;
> + data.skip = trace->skip;
> + data.no_sched_functions = 0;
> +
> + frame.fp = regs->regs[29];
> + frame.sp = regs->sp;
> + frame.pc = regs->pc;
Interesting that arm64 does not define an "lr" field in struct
stackframe like 32-bit arm does.
> +
> + walk_stackframe(current, &frame, save_trace, &data);
> + if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
> + trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
> +}
> +
> void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
> {
> struct stack_trace_data data;
>
Looks OK to me. I successfully (if briefly) tested it with v4.8-rc4 on
hikey.
Thanks,
-dl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-01 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-01 13:35 [PATCH V2] arm64:ftrace: add save_stack_trace_regs() Pratyush Anand
2016-09-01 20:38 ` David Long [this message]
2016-09-02 10:50 ` James Morse
2016-09-02 10:56 ` James Morse
2016-09-02 10:59 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57C891BC.7030502@linaro.org \
--to=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.