From: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>
To: Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Abhishek Varshney <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>,
"Dachary, Loic" <loic@dachary.org>,
"Weil, Sage" <sage@redhat.com>, "Just, Samuel" <sjust@redhat.com>,
"Dillaman, Jason" <dillaman@redhat.com>,
David Zafman <dzafman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 22:00:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57D7094D.9050400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMMFjmFRHAu8cPpLatorQ_LZ_5fcAbA082ivT1N7bA9Qr_qgdg@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/09/2016 20:19, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> Ticket http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46 updated with dev
> leads approvals (pls review) as following (suites marked with * still
> need decision/fix):
>
> rados:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
>
> rbd:
> multiple issues (Approved by Jason)
>
> krbd:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
> (Approved by Ilya)
>
> * knfs
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
> (Greg pls review/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
>
> * samba:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
> (Greg pls review/approve)
>
> upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
> (Approved by Loic)
>
> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
> (Approved by Loic)
>
> * powercycle:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
> (Sage pls review/approve)
>
> * ceph-disk
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17114
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17100
> (Loic pls review/approve)
I confirm that these problems are related to the test suite and not ceph-disk executable. Therefore they are not, in my opinion, blockers for the jewel release.
Cheers
> Thx
> YuriW
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46
>>
>> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>>
>> rados (subset 35/50 297 jobs)
>> rbd
>> rgw
>> fs
>> krbd
>> kcephfs
>> knfs
>> rest
>> hadoop
>> samba
>> ceph-deploy
>> ceph-disk
>> upgrade/client-upgrade
>> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel)
>> powercycle
>> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>>
>> ==============================
>> Issues requiring approval/decision:
>>
>> rados:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16516 (approved by DavidZ)
>>
>> rbd:
>> multiple issues (Jason pls rview/approve, see notes
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-46)
>>
>> krbd:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17223
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17222
>> (Jason pls rview/approve)
>>
>> knfs
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17192
>> (Greg pls rview/approve, note: it's similar we saw in hammer point release)
>>
>> samba:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17184
>> (Greg pls rview/approve)
>>
>> upgrade/client-upgrade:about:startpage
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16506
>> (Sage, Sam, Jason pls rview/approve)
>>
>> upgrade/infernalis-x (jewel):
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17176
>> (Sam, David pls rview/approve)
>>
>> powercycle:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17177
>> (Sage pls rview/approve)
>>
>> Loic, given that we have high number of issues in this release, if you
>> and dev leads find that we need to add more backports we may consider
>> validating a new point RC (sha1).
>>
>> Thx
>> YuriW
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-12 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-06 17:12 ceph v10.2.3 QE validation status Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-06 17:27 ` Gregory Farnum
2016-09-06 17:47 ` Ilya Dryomov
2016-09-06 20:19 ` Jason Dillaman
2016-09-06 20:26 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-07 6:33 ` Loic Dachary
2016-09-09 12:41 ` Xiaoxi Chen
2016-09-09 18:19 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-12 20:00 ` Loic Dachary [this message]
2016-09-13 16:16 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-15 18:16 ` Sage Weil
2016-09-15 19:54 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-15 20:08 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-19 20:12 ` Yuri Weinstein
2016-09-19 20:36 ` Alfredo Deza
2016-09-20 8:45 ` Loic Dachary
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57D7094D.9050400@redhat.com \
--to=ldachary@redhat.com \
--cc=abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dillaman@redhat.com \
--cc=dzafman@redhat.com \
--cc=loic@dachary.org \
--cc=sage@redhat.com \
--cc=sjust@redhat.com \
--cc=yweinste@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.