From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3sflBr6qyxzDsgc for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:18:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u8M5IMvI093587 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 01:18:26 -0400 Received: from e18.ny.us.ibm.com (e18.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.208]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 25kkrtf4wd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 01:18:25 -0400 Received: from localhost by e18.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 01:18:24 -0400 From: Ravi Bangoria Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] perf annotate: Cross arch support + few fixes To: Kim Phillips References: <1474472876-2706-1-git-send-email-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160921143427.8db0abae30690baadc18de01@arm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, treeze.taeung@gmail.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, markus@trippelsdorf.de, namhyung@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, chris.ryder@arm.com, jolsa@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, Ravi Bangoria Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:48:13 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160921143427.8db0abae30690baadc18de01@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Message-Id: <57E36995.4090101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 22 September 2016 01:04 AM, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:17:50 +0530 > Ravi Bangoria wrote: > >> Kim, I don't have arm test machine. Can you please help me to test >> this on arm. > This works for me: hitting return on return instructions yields > "Invalid jump offset", but I'll get that later. Thanks Kim. Hmm.. so, ins__find_arm does not contain logic for return instructions. Navigation with return instruction is working fine for x86 and powerpc. -Ravi > Thanks, > > Kim >