All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] futex: Throughput-optimized (TO) futexes
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:59:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57E45438.2010307@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609222339180.5640@nanos>

On 09/22/2016 05:41 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, Waiman Long wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, my initial attempt for the new futex was to use the same workflow as
>>> the PI futexes, but use mutex which has optimistic spinning instead of
>>> rt_mutex.
>> Btw, Thomas, do you still have any interest pursuing this for rtmutexes from
>> -rt into mainline? If so I can resend the patches from a while ago.
> Certainly yes. My faint memory tells me that there was some potential issue
> due to boosting the owner only if it gets scheduled out, but I might be
> wrong.

It is tricky to add optimistic spinning to rtmutexes because of the need 
to observe process priorities. It is certainly possible to make the top 
waiter spin, but then I am not sure how much performance gain with just 
that.

Cheers,
Longman

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-22 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-20 13:42 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] futex: Introducing throughput-optimized futexes Waiman Long
2016-09-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] futex: Add futex_set_timer() helper function Waiman Long
2016-09-22 21:31   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-23  0:45     ` Waiman Long
2016-09-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] futex: Rename futex_pi_state to futex_state Waiman Long
2016-09-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] futex: Throughput-optimized (TO) futexes Waiman Long
2016-09-21  6:59   ` Mike Galbraith
2016-09-21 23:37     ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22  7:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-22 13:04         ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22 13:34         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-22 14:41           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-09-22 14:46             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-22 15:11               ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-09-22 20:08                 ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22 20:28                   ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22 20:38                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-22 21:48                       ` Waiman Long
2016-09-23 13:02                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-26 22:02                           ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22 21:39                     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-09-22 21:41                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-22 21:59                         ` Waiman Long [this message]
2016-09-27 19:02                           ` [PATCH v2 -tip] locking/rtmutex: Reduce top-waiter blocking on a lock Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-24 18:08                             ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-24 18:48                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-24  1:28                         ` [PATCH " Davidlohr Bueso
2016-09-26 21:40                           ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22 19:56           ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] futex: Throughput-optimized (TO) futexes Waiman Long
2016-09-22 20:26             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-22 21:13               ` Waiman Long
2016-09-22 13:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-22 17:21     ` Waiman Long
2016-09-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] futex: Add timeout support to TO futexes Waiman Long
2016-09-20 13:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] futex, doc: TO futexes document Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57E45438.2010307@hpe.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.