From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41667) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnljf-0000HV-03 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 08:07:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnljb-0001WG-QJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 08:07:14 -0400 References: <57E5752C.3080407@virtuozzo.com> <20160923212126.vo3hvb4hxojjh7s4@grep.be> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Message-ID: <57E66C60.8040102@virtuozzo.com> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:06:56 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160923212126.vo3hvb4hxojjh7s4@grep.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] write_zeroes/trim on the whole disk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wouter Verhelst , Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel , qemu-block@nongnu.org, nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, kwolf@redhat.com, "Denis V. Lunev" , Paolo Bonzini , Stefan Hajnoczi , Alex Bligh On 24.09.2016 00:21, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 02:00:06PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: >> My preference would be a new flag to the existing commands, with >> explicit documentation that 0 offset and 0 length must be used with that >> flag, when requesting a full-device wipe. > Alternatively, what about a flag that says "if you use this flag, the > size should be left-shifted by X bits before processing"? That allows > you to do TRIM or WRITE_ZEROES on much larger chunks, without being > limited to "whole disk" commands. We should probably make it an illegal > flag for any command that actually sends data over the wire, though. > Note: if disk size is not aligned to X we will have to send request larger than the disk size to clear the whole disk. -- Best regards, Vladimir