From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1boX8Q-0001H6-Mn for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:43:59 +0000 Message-ID: <57E93401.9070505@candelatech.com> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 07:43:13 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: about ath10k support 80211r, 80211w References: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: KwangMin Kim , ath10k@lists.infradead.org Cc: =?UTF-8?B?6rCV6rK97JmE?= I don't think .11r works in stock firmware, at least in station mode. With modified firmware, it can work fine. And possibly newer upstream firmware fixes this issue. Thanks, Ben On 09/25/2016 09:43 PM, KwangMin Kim wrote: > Hi. I'm using COMPEX WLE900VX-7AA(QCA9880). > > And using kernel version 3.2.80, backport version 4.4.2. > > My Question. > > 1. Can I use "ieee80211r" and "ieee80211w" in my environment? > > 2. Have you ever tried to seamless test? If you done test, how seamless? > > > > _______________________________________________ > ath10k mailing list > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k