From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:26:08 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation.
In-Reply-To: <20160920132120.GQ25086@rric.localdomain>
References: <1474310970-21264-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
 <20160920104348.GP25086@rric.localdomain> <57E11E52.8060303@linaro.org>
 <20160920132120.GQ25086@rric.localdomain>
Message-ID: <57EA1100.2080900@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 09/20/2016 09:21 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 20.09.16 19:32:34, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 09/20/2016 06:43 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
>
>>> Unfortunately either your nor my code does fix the BUG_ON() I see with
>>> the numa kernel:
>>>
>>>   kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:1848!
>>>
>>> See below for the core dump. It looks like this happens due to moving
>>> a mem block where first and last page are mapped to different numa
>>> nodes, thus, triggering the BUG_ON().
>>
>> Didn't triggered it on our NUMA hardware, could you provide your
>> config then we can have a try?
>
> Config attached. Other configs with an initrd fail too.

hmm, we can't reproduce it on our hardware, do we need
to run some specific stress test on it?

Thanks
Hanjun

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752784AbcI0G0T (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 27 Sep 2016 02:26:19 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:33316 "EHLO
        mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751962AbcI0G0L (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 27 Sep 2016 02:26:11 -0400
Message-ID: <57EA1100.2080900@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:26:08 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
CC: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>, xieyisheng1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64, numa: Add cpu_to_node() implementation.
References: <1474310970-21264-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <20160920104348.GP25086@rric.localdomain> <57E11E52.8060303@linaro.org> <20160920132120.GQ25086@rric.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20160920132120.GQ25086@rric.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 09/20/2016 09:21 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 20.09.16 19:32:34, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 09/20/2016 06:43 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
>
>>> Unfortunately either your nor my code does fix the BUG_ON() I see with
>>> the numa kernel:
>>>
>>>   kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:1848!
>>>
>>> See below for the core dump. It looks like this happens due to moving
>>> a mem block where first and last page are mapped to different numa
>>> nodes, thus, triggering the BUG_ON().
>>
>> Didn't triggered it on our NUMA hardware, could you provide your
>> config then we can have a try?
>
> Config attached. Other configs with an initrd fail too.

hmm, we can't reproduce it on our hardware, do we need
to run some specific stress test on it?

Thanks
Hanjun