From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wols Lists Subject: Re: WARNING: mismatch_cnt is not 0 on Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:35:00 +0100 Message-ID: <57EAC9E4.2000109@youngman.org.uk> References: <26b91420-97c9-f405-aa71-16cd5cda3a67@gmail.com> <409d9f5f-6f72-a399-93ab-2b10323f4122@fnarfbargle.com> <74e5712f-e89e-97af-8aa4-ae2948c02e94@turmel.org> <27577b8a-1b63-8f1a-9b68-b056622a5268@fnarfbargle.com> <41c176d2-0235-6ff0-996c-b32dc95d487d@gmail.com> <57EAA214.8030603@youngman.org.uk> <5427ce35-f222-8a2c-486e-441c4c6ec9a6@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5427ce35-f222-8a2c-486e-441c4c6ec9a6@gmail.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Benjammin2068 , Linux-RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 27/09/16 18:30, Benjammin2068 wrote: > I have smartctl running for all my drives -- but that doesn't help me at the mdadm level. > > While you're in the docs adding stuff about mismatch_cnt, is there anything that can help someone backtrace which block cause the count to go up? This would help us mere mortals maybe go back to inspect a block or a file or something to make sure it's not corrupted. I'm planning to go back through the archives as best I can (I keep a local archive :-), and I'm starring everything of interest. So if anybody can chime in, I'll make a note! :-) All this should eventually get there ... and I'm planning to add a kernel programming section too - not least because I want to do some! Cheers, Wol