From: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] lsmod01: parse a copy of /proc/modules
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:03:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57FCD515.20202@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2063556369.71871.1472485781200.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Recovering an old thread. Please, see below:
On 08/29/2016 06:49 PM, Jan Stancek wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stanislav Kholmanskikh" <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
>> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "vasily isaenko" <vasily.isaenko@oracle.com>, ltp@lists.linux.it
>> Sent: Monday, 29 August, 2016 4:03:44 PM
>> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] lsmod01: parse a copy of /proc/modules
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/29/2016 05:00 PM, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/29/2016 04:34 PM, Jan Stancek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Stanislav Kholmanskikh" <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
>>>>> To: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>
>>>>> Cc: "vasily isaenko" <vasily.isaenko@oracle.com>, ltp@lists.linux.it
>>>>> Sent: Monday, 29 August, 2016 3:05:11 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] lsmod01: parse a copy of /proc/modules
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 08/29/2016 03:50 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>> In my environment, if TMPDIR is on NFSv4, this test case fails with:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lsmod01 1 TFAIL : lsmod output different from /proc/modules.
>>>>>>> 21c21
>>>>>>> < sunrpc 207591 28
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> > sunrpc 207591 29
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To avoid such problems I separate the process of getting data from
>>>>>>> /proc/modules and the process of parsing it in the pipe structure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the sunrpc module gets its ref counter incremented from somewhere of
>>>>>> the nfs kernel code once we open file on NFS?
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks so. I hava a share mounted from localhost:
>>>>>
>>>>> [root@skholman-m7 mnt]# mount|grep mnt
>>>>> 127.0.0.1:/opt on /mnt type nfs
>>>>> (rw,vers=4,addr=127.0.0.1,clientaddr=127.0.0.1)
>>>>> [root@skholman-m7 mnt]# awk '{print $1, $2, $3}' /proc/modules|sort >
>>>>> /tmp/not_nfs
>>>>> [root@skholman-m7 mnt]# awk '{print $1, $2, $3}' /proc/modules|sort > nfs
>>>>> [root@skholman-m7 mnt]# grep sunrpc nfs
>>>>> sunrpc 207591 29
>>>>> [root@skholman-m7 mnt]# grep sunrpc /tmp/not_nfs
>>>>> sunrpc 207591 28
>>>>> [root@skholman-m7 mnt]#
>>>>
>>>> And if you do that with just "cat /proc/modules", then there's no
>>>> difference?
>>>> Could it be that it's actually first write that takes extra ref?
>>>> cat is reading in 65536 byte chunks for me, awk only 1024.
>>>
>>> Yes, there is no difference if I use "cat /proc/modules":
>>>
>>> [root@skholman-m7 mnt]# awk '{print $1, $2, $3}' /proc/modules|sort > nfs
>>> [root@skholman-m7 mnt]# grep sunrpc nfs
>>> sunrpc 207591 29
>>> [root@skholman-m7 mnt]# cat /proc/modules > temp
>>> [root@skholman-m7 mnt]# awk '{print $1, $2, $3}' temp|sort > nfs
>>> [root@skholman-m7 mnt]# grep sunrpc temp
>>> sunrpc 207591 28 nfs,nfsd,lockd,nfs_acl,auth_rpcgss, Live
>>> 0x00000000101ec000
>>> [root@skholman-m7 mnt]#
>>>
>>> As for 1024. lsmod also reads /proc/modules in 1024 bytes chunks.
>>
>> I suppose it's something related to using the pipe construction, since
>> this change also "fixes" the issue:
>
> I'm suspecting this to be some kind of race between opening file on
> nfs and reading /proc/modules at the same time:
>
> # sh -c "cat /proc/modules | cat > temp2"; grep sunrpc temp2
> sunrpc 300464 31 nfsv3,rpcsec_gss_krb5,nfsv4,nfs,nfsd,auth_rpcgss,nfs_acl,lockd, Live 0xffffffffa03a4000
>
> # taskset -c 0 sh -c "cat /proc/modules | cat > temp2"; grep sunrpc temp2
> sunrpc 300464 30 nfsv3,rpcsec_gss_krb5,nfsv4,nfs,nfsd,auth_rpcgss,nfs_acl,lockd, Live 0xffffffffa03a4000
>
> or
>
> # dd if=/proc/modules bs=1 | cat > temp2; grep sunrpc temp2
> 6332+0 records in
> 6332+0 records out
> 6332 bytes (6.3 kB) copied, 0.00288249 s, 2.2 MB/s
> sunrpc 300464 30 nfsv3,rpcsec_gss_krb5,nfsv4,nfs,nfsd,auth_rpcgss,nfs_acl,lockd, Live 0xffffffffa03a4000
>
> # dd if=/proc/modules bs=2 | cat > temp2; grep sunrpc temp2
> 3166+0 records in
> 3166+0 records out
> 6332 bytes (6.3 kB) copied, 0.00148174 s, 4.3 MB/s
> sunrpc 300464 31 nfsv3,rpcsec_gss_krb5,nfsv4,nfs,nfsd,auth_rpcgss,nfs_acl,lockd, Live 0xffffffffa03a4000
>
> or
>
> # cat /proc/modules | sh -c cat > temp2; grep sunrpc temp2
> sunrpc 300464 31 nfsv3,rpcsec_gss_krb5,nfsv4,nfs,nfsd,auth_rpcgss,nfs_acl,lockd, Live 0xffffffffa03a4000
>
> # cat /proc/modules | sh -c "cat > temp2"; grep sunrpc temp2
> sunrpc 300464 30 nfsv3,rpcsec_gss_krb5,nfsv4,nfs,nfsd,auth_rpcgss,nfs_acl,lockd, Live 0xffffffffa03a4000
>
Tried this all again.
This is from a 4.1-based kernel in a VirtualBox host:
[root@ol6-x64 mnt]# mount|grep mnt
127.0.0.1:/opt/ on /mnt type nfs (rw,vers=3,addr=127.0.0.1)
[root@ol6-x64 mnt]# grep sunrpc /proc/modules
sunrpc 329262 28
nfsv3,rpcsec_gss_krb5,nfsv4,nfs,nfsd,lockd,nfs_acl,auth_rpcgss, Live
0xffffffffa0366000
[root@ol6-x64 mnt]# dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=512
While the above dd command is running, in a separate shell I see:
[stas@ol6-x64 ~]$ lsmod|grep sunrpc
sunrpc 329262 36
nfsv3,rpcsec_gss_krb5,nfsv4,nfs,nfsd,lockd,nfs_acl,auth_rpcgss
[stas@ol6-x64 ~]$
[root@ol6-x64 mnt]# grep sunrpc /proc/modules
sunrpc 329262 28
nfsv3,rpcsec_gss_krb5,nfsv4,nfs,nfsd,lockd,nfs_acl,auth_rpcgss, Live
0xffffffffa0366000
[root@ol6-x64 mnt]# dd if=/proc/modules bs=1 | cat > temp2; grep sunrpc
temp2
2564+0 records in
2564+0 records out
2564 bytes (2.6 kB) copied, 0.00313203 s, 819 kB/s
sunrpc 329262 29
nfsv3,rpcsec_gss_krb5,nfsv4,nfs,nfsd,lockd,nfs_acl,auth_rpcgss, Live
0xffffffffa0366000
[root@ol6-x64 mnt]#
The same situation is with NFSv4.
So it turns out that writing to a file on NFS increases the sunrpc
module reference counter. I don't observe this with ext4.ko.
So I find that my original patch is fine, it just needs a proper
description.
Thoughts?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-11 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-29 11:08 [LTP] [PATCH] lsmod01: parse a copy of /proc/modules Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2016-08-29 12:50 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-08-29 13:05 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2016-08-29 13:34 ` Jan Stancek
2016-08-29 14:00 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2016-08-29 14:03 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2016-08-29 15:17 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-08-29 15:49 ` Jan Stancek
2016-10-11 12:03 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh [this message]
2016-10-11 13:38 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-10-11 15:47 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2016-10-11 16:15 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-11-09 14:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH] lsmod01: keep the output in variables Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2016-11-09 16:49 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-11-10 10:07 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2016-11-10 11:39 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-11-10 14:15 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2016-08-31 13:55 ` [LTP] [PATCH] lsmod01: parse a copy of /proc/modules Cyril Hrubis
2016-09-02 14:12 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57FCD515.20202@oracle.com \
--to=stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.