diff for duplicates of <5807AC2B.4090208@linux.intel.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 0d96864..73753f2 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 On 10/19/2016 10:01 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
 > The question I had earlier was whether this has to be an explicit FOLL
-> flag used by g-u-p users or we can just use it internally when mm !=
-> current->mm
+> flag used by g-u-p users or we can just use it internally when mm !> current->mm
 
 The reason I chose not to do that was that deferred work gets run under
 a basically random 'current'.  If we just use 'mm != current->mm', then
@@ -10,7 +9,3 @@ basically randomly.
 
 We want to be consistent with whether they are enforced or not, so we
 explicitly indicate that by calling the remote variant vs. plain.
-_______________________________________________
-Intel-gfx mailing list
-Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
-https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 9682792..f5691d6 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
  "ref\020161019170127.GN24393@dhcp22.suse.cz\0"
  "From\0Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 00/10] mm: adjust get_user_pages* functions to explicitly pass FOLL_* flags\0"
- "Date\0Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:23:55 -0700\0"
+ "Date\0Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:23:55 +0000\0"
  "To\0Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>\0"
  "Cc\0linux-mips@linux-mips.org"
   linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
@@ -42,8 +42,7 @@
  "b\0"
  "On 10/19/2016 10:01 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:\n"
  "> The question I had earlier was whether this has to be an explicit FOLL\n"
- "> flag used by g-u-p users or we can just use it internally when mm !=\n"
- "> current->mm\n"
+ "> flag used by g-u-p users or we can just use it internally when mm !> current->mm\n"
  "\n"
  "The reason I chose not to do that was that deferred work gets run under\n"
  "a basically random 'current'.  If we just use 'mm != current->mm', then\n"
@@ -51,10 +50,6 @@
  "basically randomly.\n"
  "\n"
  "We want to be consistent with whether they are enforced or not, so we\n"
- "explicitly indicate that by calling the remote variant vs. plain.\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "Intel-gfx mailing list\n"
- "Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org\n"
- https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
+ explicitly indicate that by calling the remote variant vs. plain.
 
-6446b4103e492bdecd60de8280c51fe8f9d0bcef641f402ebcee2e7c5118eb81
+5a2950896ee1b93cd92b473a2037753e3460465008a14a2b3436439ee34dd0b8
