From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: jewel: bad rados_buffer_free from librados python bindings Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:33:59 +0200 Message-ID: <58089D97.2020606@dachary.org> References: <580881D6.2070603@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:34263 "EHLO relay5-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752837AbcJTKeE (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 06:34:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <580881D6.2070603@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: Ceph Development It passed 10 times in a row on the same branch (http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-10-20_09:32:24-rados-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/). I guess it's a rare transient error and we were unlucky enough to hit it twice in a row. On 20/10/2016 10:35, Loic Dachary wrote: > H Sage, > > It looks like http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15454 surfaced in jewel (failed twice in a row at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-19). It did not occur before, therefore I suspect it's a side effect of some of the commits in the jewel backports integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-16 ), but I don't see which commit in that branch could have caused that kind of misbehavior. > > Since you marked http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15454 as Resolved with no commits attached, I suppose it means it went away for some reason. Could you please confirm ? > > Cheers > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre