From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Subject: Re: including PHY tree in linux-next Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:09:45 +0530 Message-ID: <58099C11.8050700@ti.com> References: <5808995C.3010300@ti.com> <20161021090041.46cc5fee@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:48800 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752051AbcJUEjx (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:39:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20161021090041.46cc5fee@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Friday 21 October 2016 03:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Kishon, > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:45:56 +0530 Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> >> Can you include the following branches for linux-phy tree into linux-next? >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git next >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git fixes > > Added from today (called phy-next and phy respectively). Will these be > merged via Dave Miller's trees, or directly to Linus? I send pull request to gregkh. This tree contains USB, SATA and other PHYs except ethernet PHY. greg generally merges it into his USB tree. > > Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As > you may know, this is not a judgement of your code. The purpose of > linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of > conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. > > You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have > been: > * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's > Signed-off-by, hmm.. I see atleast 4 drivers in drivers/phy which has just MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"). I can check if these can be changed to GPL v2. > * posted to the relevant mailing list, > * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree), > * successfully unit tested, and > * destined for the current or next Linux merge window. > > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him > to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary. sure, I understand and agree to all of this. Thanks Kishon